Literature DB >> 20085198

Performance over time on adults with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants.

Son-A Chang1, Richard S Tyler, Camille C Dunn, Haihong Ji, Shelley A Witt, Bruce Gantz, Marlan Hansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maximum performance and long-term stability of bilateral cochlear implants has become an important topic because there has been increasing numbers of recipients of bilateral cochlear implants.
PURPOSE: To determine the performance over time (up to 6yr) of subjects with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants (CI+CI) on word recognition and localization. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Over-time investigation of word recognition in quiet (CNC) and sound localization in quiet (Everyday Sounds Localization Test). STUDY SAMPLE: The subjects were 48 adults who simultaneously received their cochlear implants at the University of Iowa.
RESULTS: For word recognition, percent correct scores continuously improved up to 1 yr postimplantation with the most benefit occurring within the first month of implantation. In observing up to 72 mo, the averaged scores reached to the plateau of about 63% correct in CNC after 2 yr (N = 31). But, when we followed 17 subjects who have complete data set between 12 mo and 48+ months, word recognition scores were significantly different from 12 mo to 48 + months, which implies binaural advantages need more time to be developed. Localization test results suggested that the root mean square (RMS) error scores continuously improved up to 1 yr postimplantation with most benefits occurring within the first 3 mo. After 2 yr, the averaged scores reached to the plateau of about 20 degrees RMS error (N = 27). When we followed 10 subjects who have complete data set between 12 mo and 48+ months, localization scores were not improved from 12 mo to 48+ months. There were large individual differences in performance over time.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, substantial benefits in both word recognition and localization were found over the first 1-12 mo postimplantation for subjects who received simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants. These benefits were maintained over time up to 6yr postimplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20085198      PMCID: PMC2850211          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.1.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  29 in total

Review 1.  Update on bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Shelley A Witt; John P Preece
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Localization by postlingually deafened adults fitted with a single cochlear implant.

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Todd A Ricketts; Daniel H Ashmead; Robert F Labadie; David S Haynes
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Multicenter U.S. bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: speech perception over the first year of use.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman; Carol H Pillsbury; Marcia S Clark; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie; Susan Amberg; Peter S Roland; Pamela Kruger; Michael A Novak; Julie A Wirth; Jennifer M Black; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; P Ashley Wackym; Jill B Firszt; Blake S Wilson; Dewey T Lawson; Reinhold Schatzer; Patrick S C D'Haese; Amy L Barco
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Long-term performance of Clarion 1.0 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Chad V Ruffin; Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Bruce J Gantz; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead; Todd A Ricketts; Robert F Labadie; David S Haynes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation: prospective study in adults.

Authors:  Dawn Burton Koch; Sigfrid D Soli; Mark Downing; Mary Joe Osberger
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2009-02-26

7.  Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Olivier Sterkers; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Benoit Godey; Alain Robier; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse; Philippe Bordure; Michel Mondain; Didier Bouccara; Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Stéphanie Borel; Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan; Evelyne Ferrary
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Variables affecting speech perception in postlingually deaf adults following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Jafar Hamzavi; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Stefan Marcel Pok; Peter Franz; Wolfgang Gstoettner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Hearing-in-noise benefits after bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation continue to improve 4 years after implantation.

Authors:  Rose J Eapen; Emily Buss; Marcia Clark Adunka; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: speech perception results from 1984 until today.

Authors:  Beate Krueger; Gert Joseph; Urte Rost; Angelika Strauss-Schier; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Buechner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  14 in total

1.  A longitudinal study in adults with sequential bilateral cochlear implants: time course for individual ear and bilateral performance.

Authors:  Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Michael J Strube
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) Changes Over Time in Adults With Simultaneous Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Richard Tyler; Haihong Ji; Camille Dunn; Ningyu Wang; Marlan Hansen; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Change in Speech Perception and Auditory Evoked Potentials over Time after Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults.

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Andrea S Kelly
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

4.  Initial development of a spatially separated speech-in-noise and localization training program.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  [Cochlear implantation: a changing indication].

Authors:  T Stark; S Helbig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation: speech perception and localization pre- and post-second cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Shelley Witt; Haihong Ji; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Laura K Holden; Noël Y Dwyer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  A physiological and behavioral system for hearing restoration with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Julia King; Ina Shehu; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Erin Glennon; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.