D Wesley Grantham1, Todd A Ricketts, Daniel H Ashmead, Robert F Labadie, David S Haynes. 1. Department of Hearing & Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center for Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. d.wesley.grantham@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: : The main purpose of the study was to assess the ability of adults with unilateral cochlear implants to localize noise and speech signals in the horizontal plane. DESIGN: : Six unilaterally implanted adults, all postlingually deafened and all fitted with MED-EL COMBI 40+ devices, were tested with a modified source identification task. Subjects were tested individually in an anechoic chamber, which contained an array of 43 numbered loudspeakers extending from -90 degrees to +90 degrees azimuth. On each trial, a 200 millisecond signal (either a noise burst or a speech sample) was presented from one of nine active loudspeakers, and the subject had to identify which source (from the 43 loudspeakers in the array) produced the signal. RESULTS: : The relationship between source azimuth and response azimuth was characterized in terms of the adjusted constant error (C). C for three subjects was near chance (50.5 degrees ), whereas C for the remaining three subjects was significantly better than chance (35 degrees -44 degrees ). By comparison, C for a group of normal-hearing listeners was 5.6 degrees . For two of the three subjects who performed better than chance, monaural cues were determined to be the basis for their localization performance. CONCLUSIONS: : Some unilaterally implanted subjects can localize sounds at a better than chance level, apparently because they can learn to make use of subtle monaural cues based on frequency-dependent head-shadow effects. However, their performance is significantly poorer than that reported in previous studies of bilaterally implanted subjects, who are able to take advantage of binaural cues.
OBJECTIVE: : The main purpose of the study was to assess the ability of adults with unilateral cochlear implants to localize noise and speech signals in the horizontal plane. DESIGN: : Six unilaterally implanted adults, all postlingually deafened and all fitted with MED-EL COMBI 40+ devices, were tested with a modified source identification task. Subjects were tested individually in an anechoic chamber, which contained an array of 43 numbered loudspeakers extending from -90 degrees to +90 degrees azimuth. On each trial, a 200 millisecond signal (either a noise burst or a speech sample) was presented from one of nine active loudspeakers, and the subject had to identify which source (from the 43 loudspeakers in the array) produced the signal. RESULTS: : The relationship between source azimuth and response azimuth was characterized in terms of the adjusted constant error (C). C for three subjects was near chance (50.5 degrees ), whereas C for the remaining three subjects was significantly better than chance (35 degrees -44 degrees ). By comparison, C for a group of normal-hearing listeners was 5.6 degrees . For two of the three subjects who performed better than chance, monaural cues were determined to be the basis for their localization performance. CONCLUSIONS: : Some unilaterally implanted subjects can localize sounds at a better than chance level, apparently because they can learn to make use of subtle monaural cues based on frequency-dependent head-shadow effects. However, their performance is significantly poorer than that reported in previous studies of bilaterally implanted subjects, who are able to take advantage of binaural cues.
Authors: Michael F Dorman; Daniel Zeitler; Sarah J Cook; Louise Loiselle; William A Yost; George B Wanna; Rene H Gifford Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 1.854
Authors: Son-A Chang; Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Haihong Ji; Shelley A Witt; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 1.664
Authors: John Murphy; A Quentin Summerfield; Gerard M O'Donoghue; David R Moore Journal: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2011-02-05 Impact factor: 1.675
Authors: Annes J Claes; Paul Van de Heyning; Annick Gilles; Anouk Hofkens-Van den Brandt; Vincent Van Rompaey; Griet Mertens Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 4.677