Literature DB >> 18520586

Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: speech perception results from 1984 until today.

Beate Krueger1, Gert Joseph, Urte Rost, Angelika Strauss-Schier, Thomas Lenarz, Andreas Buechner.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: More than 3,000 patients have received a cochlear implant in Hannover.
METHODS: A group of 864 patients was selected from the main group for the analysis of speech perception development. Depending on the term of introduction of new implant technology, the viewed group was divided into 5 subgroups.
RESULTS: The test battery during regular clinical checkups included speech perception tests. Those tests changed during 20 years; only speech tracking and monosyllable word test remained and were the bases for forming performance classes shown in this study. Three performance classes can be specified for all 5 subgroups by mean values and standard deviations.
CONCLUSION: In all subgroups, an improvement of speech perception can be observed over time. The current patient group showed significant better performing results than those of the first group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18520586     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318171972f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  22 in total

1.  Long-term results of the transattical approach: an alternative technique for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Miguel Vaca; Auxiliadora Gutiérrez; Rubén Polo; Antonio Alonso; Felipe Álvarez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Influence of "novel" speech processors on the speech perception performance of cochlear implant users].

Authors:  I Baljić
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Cortical activation patterns to spatially presented pure tone stimuli with different intensities measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Günther Bauernfeind; Selina C Wriessnegger; Sabine Haumann; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural mechanisms supporting robust discrimination of spectrally and temporally degraded speech.

Authors:  Kamalini G Ranasinghe; William A Vrana; Chanel J Matney; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-02

5.  Performance over time on adults with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Son-A Chang; Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Haihong Ji; Shelley A Witt; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Christine P Etlert; Sara O'Brient; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels.

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  Beyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain.

Authors:  David R Moore; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  [Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels. German version].

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Direct recordings from the auditory cortex in a cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Christine P Etler; John F Brugge; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Richard A Reale; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.