Literature DB >> 19180675

Hearing-in-noise benefits after bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation continue to improve 4 years after implantation.

Rose J Eapen1, Emily Buss, Marcia Clark Adunka, Harold C Pillsbury, Craig A Buchman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this 4-year longitudinal study was to assess the stability of the binaural benefits of head shadow, summation, and squelch for bilateral cochlear implant recipients and to quantify these benefits for the understanding of speech in noise.
DESIGN: This is a prospective study of 9 patients who received simultaneous bilateral insertion of MED-EL COMBI +40 cochlear implants in a single-stage operation at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Each patient had postlingual deafness of short duration before insertion of the device. Each year, the patients were tested for word recognition using consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet and speech perception in noise using City University of New York sentences. These tests were administered using direct audio input to the implants. Head-related transfer functions were used to simulate speech in noise testing in a spatial environment. Speech was always presented at midline (0 degrees), and the noise masker was presented at either side or midline (-90, 0, +90 degrees).
RESULTS: The binaural benefits of head shadow and summation effects developed early in the postoperative period and remained stable throughout the follow-up period. Squelch developed more slowly and was first demonstrated at 12 months after implantation but continued to increase beyond the first year of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Benefits of head shadow and summation emerge early and remain stable. However, squelch has the most protracted period of development, with increasing benefit after a year or more of implant experience. These data support the idea that binaural integration continues several years after insertion of bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19180675      PMCID: PMC3357061          DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181925025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  14 in total

1.  Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Richard S Tyler; Jay T Rubinstein; Abigail Wolaver; Mary Lowder; Paul Abbas; Carolyn Brown; Michelle Hughes; John P Preece
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Joachim Müller; F Schön; J Helms
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Speech reception thresholds obtained in a symmetrical four-loudspeaker arrangement from bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants.

Authors:  Franz Schön; Joachim Müller; Jan Helms
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant.

Authors:  P Schleich; P Nopp; P D'Haese
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Learning effects associated with repeated word-recognition measures using sentence materials.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Theodore S Bell; John A Koslowski
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

6.  Multicenter U.S. bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: speech perception over the first year of use.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman; Carol H Pillsbury; Marcia S Clark; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie; Susan Amberg; Peter S Roland; Pamela Kruger; Michael A Novak; Julie A Wirth; Jennifer M Black; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; P Ashley Wackym; Jill B Firszt; Blake S Wilson; Dewey T Lawson; Reinhold Schatzer; Patrick S C D'Haese; Amy L Barco
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead; Todd A Ricketts; Robert F Labadie; David S Haynes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Clinical issues and options in binaural hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  D Byrne
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli; Carol Sammeth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.

Authors:  Roland Laszig; Antje Aschendorff; Matthias Stecker; Joachim Müller-Deile; Steffen Maune; Norbert Dillier; Benno Weber; Matthias Hey; Klaus Begall; Thomas Lenarz; Rolf-D Battmer; Melanie Böhm; Thomas Steffens; Juergen Strutz; Thomas Linder; Rudolf Probst; John Allum; Martin Westhofen; Wolfgang Doering
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  30 in total

1.  Statistical bias in the assessment of binaural benefit relative to the better ear.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Marshall Lawler; Jeffrey Yu; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Lisa Cowdrey; Sarah King
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Natalie Pak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Sterling W Sheffield; Kate Teece; Amy P Olund
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Joshua E Fabie; Prashant N Bhenswala; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Performance over time on adults with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Son-A Chang; Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Haihong Ji; Shelley A Witt; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Alden O Timme; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Binaural benefit with and without a bilateral spectral mismatch in acoustic simulations of cochlear implant processing.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.