Literature DB >> 20037131

In vitro evaluation of MR imaging issues at 3T for aneurysm clips made from MP35N: Findings and information applied to 155 additional aneurysm clips.

F G Shellock1, S Valencerina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Aneurysm clips need to be tested at 3T to characterize MR imaging concerns, including magnetic field interactions, MR imaging-related heating, and artifacts. Therefore, we evaluated these risks for aneurysm clips.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different MP35N aneurysm clips (Codman Slim-Line Aneurysm Clip, straight, blade length 25-mm; Codman Slim-Line Aneurysm Clip Graft, 5-mm diameter x 5-mm width; Codman Slim-Line Aneurysm Clip, reinforcing 30 degrees angle, 6-mm x 18-mm) that represented the largest mass for 155 additional clips made from MP35N were tested. The clips were evaluated at 3T for magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts. We studied MR imaging-related heating, placing the clip in a gelled-saline-filled phantom with MR imaging performed by using a transmit/receive radio-frequency body coil at a whole-body average SAR of 3 W/kg for 15 minutes. Artifacts were characterized by using T1-SE and GRE pulse sequences.
RESULTS: Each aneurysm clip showed relatively minor magnetic field interactions, which would not cause movement in situ. Heating was not excessive (highest temperature change, <1.8 degrees C). Artifacts may create problems if the area of interest is in the same area or close to the aneurysm clip.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation demonstrated that it would be acceptable (ie, "MR conditional" using current terminology) for patients with these aneurysm clips to undergo MR imaging at < or =3T. Notably, on the basis of the sizes of the clips that underwent testing, these findings pertain to 155 additional aneurysm clips made from the same material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20037131      PMCID: PMC7964220          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  25 in total

1.  Safety of MR scanning in patients with nonferromagnetic aneurysm clips.

Authors:  G L Pride; J Kowal; D B Mendelsohn; D P Chason; J L Fleckenstein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Detachable coil for cerebral aneurysms: in vitro evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 3T.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock; Matthew Gounis; Ajay Wakhloo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice. Part II. Technical considerations and clinical applications.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Frank Träber; Jürgen Gieseke; Wolfgang Drahanowsky; Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz; Winfried Willinek; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Christoph Manka; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  MR labeling information for implants and devices: explanation of terminology.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock; Terry O Woods; John V Crues
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  MRI safety update 2008: part 2, screening patients for MRI.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock; Alberto Spinazzi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces.

Authors:  F G Shellock; J V Crues
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Placement of a ferromagnetic intracerebral aneurysm clip in a magnetic field with a fatal outcome.

Authors:  R P Klucznik; D A Carrier; R Pyka; R W Haid
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P F New; B R Rosen; T J Brady; F S Buonanno; J P Kistler; C T Burt; W S Hinshaw; J H Newhouse; G M Pohost; J M Taveras
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: surgery, coiling, or nothing?

Authors:  Joseph D Burns; Robert D Brown
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  Aneurysm clips: evaluation of MR imaging artifacts at 1.5 T.

Authors:  F G Shellock; E Kanal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  3-T MRI safety assessments of magnetic dental attachments and castable magnetic alloys.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; K Miyata; Y Abe; T Ishii; T Ishigami; K Ohtani; E Nagai; T Ohyama; Y Umekawa; S Nakabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Artifact quantification and tractography from 3T MRI after placement of aneurysm clips in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.

Authors:  Faraz Khursheed; Fiona Rohlffs; Shuichi Suzuki; Dong H Kim; Timothy M Ellmore
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for metallic surgical implants: findings applied to 61 additional skin closure staples and vessel ligation clips.

Authors:  Amreeta Gill; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Assessment of MRI Issues at 3 Tesla for a New Metallic Tissue Marker.

Authors:  Charlotte M Cronenweth; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-07-22

5.  Assessment of safety and interference issues of radio frequency identification devices in 0.3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.

Authors:  M Periyasamy; R Dhanasekaran
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.