Literature DB >> 18372462

Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice. Part II. Technical considerations and clinical applications.

Christiane K Kuhl1, Frank Träber, Jürgen Gieseke, Wolfgang Drahanowsky, Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz, Winfried Willinek, Marcus von Falkenhausen, Christoph Manka, Hans H Schild.   

Abstract

This is the second part of a two-part series on the clinical applications of high-field-strength (3.0-T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and spectroscopy. In this part, the current level of evidence regarding the use of higher magnetic field strengths for cardiac imaging techniques (including the assessment of cardiac anatomy and function), breast and pelvic imaging, musculoskeletal applications, pediatric imaging, and MR spectroscopy is presented. Published data are interpreted from the perspective of the clinical radiologist. Specific difficulties associated with high-field-strength MR for body imaging and for spectroscopic applications are reviewed and compared with the expected or documented added value of high-field-strength MR for clinical patient care. The overall number of studies published on clinical body high-field-strength MR is still small, and there is evidence for a clinical advantage for selected, but not all, body MR imaging applications. Even without published evidence, clinical experience suggests substantial clinical advantages for musculoskeletal and pediatric applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18372462     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2471061828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

Review 1.  Whole-body MR imaging, bone diffusion imaging: how and why?

Authors:  Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-30

2.  Multiparametric MRI biomarkers for measuring vascular disrupting effect on cancer.

Authors:  Huaijun Wang; Guy Marchal; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28

3.  Current Status and New Developments in Breast MRI.

Authors:  Katja C Siegmann; Bernhard Krämer; Claus Claussen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Effect of age on the fractional anisotropy (FA) value of peripheral nerves and clinical significance of the age-corrected FA value for evaluating polyneuropathies.

Authors:  Keizo Tanitame; Yoshiko Iwakado; Yuji Akiyama; Hiroki Ueno; Kazuhide Ochi; Keiko Otani; Miyuki Takasu; Shuji Date; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Current and future trends in magnetic resonance imaging assessments of the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Mia Levy; David Smith; E Brian Welch; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.375

6.  Ocular volumetry using fast high-resolution MRI during visual fixation.

Authors:  K Tanitame; T Sone; T Miyoshi; N Tanitame; K Otani; Y Akiyama; M Takasu; S Date; Y Kiuchi; K Awai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  In vitro evaluation of MR imaging issues at 3T for aneurysm clips made from MP35N: Findings and information applied to 155 additional aneurysm clips.

Authors:  F G Shellock; S Valencerina
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy.

Authors:  Xin Kang; Mieke M Cannie; Owen J Arthurs; Valerie Segers; Catherine Fourneau; Elisa Bevilacqua; Teresa Cos Sanchez; Neil J Sebire; Jacques C Jani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3.0 T: current state of the art.

Authors:  John N Oshinski; Jana G Delfino; Puneet Sharma; Ahmed M Gharib; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Visualizing the prostate gland by MR imaging in young and old mice.

Authors:  Murali Ravoori; Jyoti Duggal; Mihai Gagea; Lin Han; Sheela Singh; Ping Liu; Wei Wei; Dustin K Ragan; James A Bankson; Jingfei Ma; Vikas Kundra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.