Literature DB >> 3260731

High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces.

F G Shellock1, J V Crues.   

Abstract

Ferromagnetic biomedical implants are considered a contraindication for MR imaging primarily because of the potential hazards associated with their movement or dislodgment. Many metallic biomedical implants are composed of nonferromagnetic materials and do not present a danger to patients during MR imaging. Therefore, to evaluate the ferromagnetic qualities of 36 different metallic biomedical implants (four aneurysm clips, six hemostatic clips, four dental implants, seven prosthetic heart valves, eight orthopedic prostheses, one artificial urinary sphincter, three contraceptive diaphragms, and three cerebral ventricular shunt tube connectors) not previously evaluated with a high-field-strength MR system, we measured deflection forces at the portal of the magnet of a 1.5-T MR system. Fourteen of the 36 metallic biomedical implants were determined to be ferromagnetic as indicated by their deflection in the static magnetic field. However, only the four aneurysm clips (Drake, Mayfield, McFadden, and Sundt-Kees) had sufficient ferromagnetism to warrant exclusion of patients with these implants from imaging with a 1.5-T MR system because of the possibility of movement or displacement. The calculated deflection forces for these aneurysm clips were comparable with previously reported values of certain aneurysm clips that have been designated to present a risk for patients undergoing MR imaging. Patients with 32 of 36 metallic biomedical implants tested can be safely imaged with high-field-strength MR systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3260731     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.151.2.389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  15 in total

1.  Experience with magnetic resonance imaging of human subjects with passive implants and tattoos at 7 T: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yacine Noureddine; Andreas K Bitz; Mark E Ladd; Markus Thürling; Susanne C Ladd; Gregor Schaefers; Oliver Kraff
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Safety of intrauterine contraceptive devices during MR imaging.

Authors:  T Hess; B Stepanow; M V Knopp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of ferromagnetism and magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of the Strecker tantalum vascular stent.

Authors:  G P Teitelbaum; M Raney; M J Carvlin; A H Matsumoto; K H Barth
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  A novel MR-compatible sensor to assess active medical device safety: stimulation monitoring, rectified radio frequency pulses, and gradient-induced voltage measurements.

Authors:  Thérèse Barbier; Sarra Aissani; Nicolas Weber; Cédric Pasquier; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine after surgery with or without implant.

Authors:  H Leclet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Motion and image artifacts of various intracranial aneurysm clips in a magnetic field.

Authors:  K Ooka; M Shibuya; Y Suzuki
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Imaging and quantifying valvular heart disease using magnetic resonance techniques.

Authors:  George E Gentchos; Marc D Tischler; Timothy F Christian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-12

8.  Aneurysm clips: evaluation of magnetic field interactions and translational attraction by use of "long-bore" and "short-bore" 3.0-T MR imaging systems.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock; Jean A Tkach; Paul M Ruggieri; Thomas J Masaryk; Peter A Rasmussen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  In vitro evaluation of MR imaging issues at 3T for aneurysm clips made from MP35N: Findings and information applied to 155 additional aneurysm clips.

Authors:  F G Shellock; S Valencerina
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Dental implant systems.

Authors:  Yoshiki Oshida; Elif B Tuna; Oya Aktören; Koray Gençay
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.