Literature DB >> 20033246

Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Michael Hofmann1, Jan Wouters.   

Abstract

Auditory steady state responses are neural potentials in response to repeated auditory stimuli. This study shows that electrically evoked auditory steady state responses (EASSRs) to low-rate pulse trains can be reliably recorded by electrodes placed on the scalp of a cochlear implant (CI) user and separated from the artifacts generated by the electrical stimulation. Response properties are described, and the predictive value of EASSRs for behaviorally hearing thresholds is analyzed. For six users of a Cochlear Nucleus CI, EASSRs to symmetric biphasic pulse trains with rates between 35 and 47 Hz were recorded with seven scalp electrodes. The influence of various stimulus parameters was assessed: pulse rate, stimulus intensity, monopolar or bipolar stimulation mode, and presentation of either one pulse train on one electrode or interleaved pulse trains with different pulse rates on multiple electrodes. To compensate for the electrical artifacts caused by the stimulus pulses and radio frequency transmission, different methods of artifact reduction were employed. The validity of the recorded responses was confirmed by recording on-off responses, determination of response latency across the measured pulse rates, and comparison of amplitude growth of stimulus artifact and response amplitude. For stimulation in the 40 Hz range, response latencies of 35.6 ms (SD = 5.3 ms) were obtained. Responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli on different electrodes can be evoked, and the electrophysiological thresholds determined from EASSR amplitude growth in the 40 Hz range correlate well with behaviorally determined threshold levels for pulse rates of 41 Hz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033246      PMCID: PMC2862921          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0201-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  51 in total

1.  Nonlinear adaptive filtering of stimulus artifact.

Authors:  R Grieve; P A Parker; B Hudgins; K Englehart
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Takao Hashimoto; Christopher M Elder; Jerrold L Vitek
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Comparison of procedures to determine electrical stimulation thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  A van Wieringen; J Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Brief, noninjurious electric waveform for stimulation of the brain.

Authors:  J C LILLY; J R HUGHES; E C ALVORD; T W GALKIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Auditory steady-state response evaluation of auditory thresholds in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Mikael Ménard; Stéphane Gallego; Eric Truy; Christian Berger-Vachon; John D Durrant; Lionel Collet
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Stimulus artefact in somatosensory evoked potential measurement.

Authors:  R N Scott; L McLean; P A Parker
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton; B L Boucher; A Durieux-Smith; S C Champagne; L M Moran; M C Perez-Abalo; V Martin; G Savio
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Suppression of simulation artifacts from myoelectric-evoked potential recordings.

Authors:  M Knaflitz; R Merletti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09

10.  Spectra of auditory brainstem responses and spontaneous EEG.

Authors:  J R Boston
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  14 in total

1.  Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-09

2.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

3.  Free-Field Cortical Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Razieh Alemi; Sylvie Nozaradan; Alexandre Lehmann
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Causal Relationship between the Right Auditory Cortex and Speech-Evoked Envelope-Following Response: Evidence from Combined Transcranial Stimulation and Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Guangting Mai; Peter Howell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Auditory steady state responses and cochlear implants: Modeling the artifact-response mixture in the perspective of denoising.

Authors:  Faten Mina; Virginie Attina; Yvan Duroc; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  tACS motor system effects can be caused by transcutaneous stimulation of peripheral nerves.

Authors:  Boateng Asamoah; Ahmad Khatoun; Myles Mc Laughlin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Stimulus-evoked phase-locked activity along the human auditory pathway strongly varies across individuals.

Authors:  Robin Gransier; Michael Hofmann; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Objective assessment of spectral ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners using cortical evoked responses to an oddball paradigm.

Authors:  Alejandro Lopez Valdes; Myles Mc Laughlin; Laura Viani; Peter Walshe; Jaclyn Smith; Fan-Gang Zeng; Richard B Reilly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Hongmei Hu; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Robin Gransier; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.