Literature DB >> 34185222

Free-Field Cortical Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.

Razieh Alemi1,2,3, Sylvie Nozaradan4, Alexandre Lehmann5,6,7.   

Abstract

Auditory steady-state evoked potentials (SS-EPs) are phase-locked neural responses to periodic stimuli, believed to reflect specific neural generators. As an objective measure, steady-state responses have been used in different clinical settings, including measuring hearing thresholds of normal and hearing-impaired subjects. Recent studies are in favor of recording these responses as a part of the cochlear implant (CI) device-fitting procedure. Considering these potential benefits, the goals of the present study were to assess the feasibility of recording free-field SS-EPs in CI users and to compare their characteristics between CI users and controls. By taking advantage of a recently developed dual-frequency tagging method, we attempted to record subcortical and cortical SS-EPs from adult CI users and controls and measured reliable subcortical and cortical SS-EPs in the control group. Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to remove CI stimulation artifacts, yet subcortical responses of several CIs were heavily contaminated by these artifacts. Consequently, only cortical SS-EPs were compared between groups, which were found to be larger in the controls. The lower cortical SS-EPs' amplitude in CI users might indicate a reduction in neural synchrony evoked by the modulation rate of the auditory input across different neural assemblies in the auditory pathway. The brain topographies of cortical auditory SS-EPs, the time course of cortical responses, and the reconstructed cortical maps were highly similar between groups, confirming their neural origin and possibility to obtain such responses also in CI recipients. As for subcortical SS-EPs, our results highlight a need for sophisticated denoising algorithms to pinpoint and remove artifactual components from the biological response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory hierarchy; Auditory steady-state evoked potentials; Cochlear implant; Frequency-tagging approach

Year:  2021        PMID: 34185222     DOI: 10.1007/s10548-021-00860-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  78 in total

1.  Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity.

Authors:  A M Dale; A K Liu; B R Fischl; R L Buckner; J W Belliveau; J D Lewine; E Halgren
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Source localization of auditory evoked potentials after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Stefan Debener; Jemma Hine; Stefan Bleeck; Julie Eyles
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Hierarchical computation in the canonical auditory cortical circuit.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Laminar diversity of dynamic sound processing in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Middle Latency Responses to Optimized Chirps in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Razieh Alemi; Alexandre Lehmann
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  A New Method to Test the Efficiency of Cochlear Implant Artifacts Removal From Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Virginie Attina; Faten Mina; Pierre Stahl; Yvan Duroc; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Independent component analysis for auditory evoked potentials and cochlear implant artifact estimation.

Authors:  Norma Castañeda-Villa; Christopher J James
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Excitatory local connections of superficial neurons in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour; Edward M Callaway
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  An objective neural signature of rapid perspective taking.

Authors:  Alexy A Beck; Bruno Rossion; Dana Samson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.