Literature DB >> 9246854

Stimulus artefact in somatosensory evoked potential measurement.

R N Scott1, L McLean, P A Parker.   

Abstract

When an electrical stimulus is used to evoke action potentials in peripheral nerves or the spinal cord, the stimulus causes an artefact which may interfere with measurement of the evoked potentials. This artefact, unlike all other sources of noise in the measurement, cannot be reduced by ensemble averaging. Confusion about the origin and transmission of stimulus artefact has led to considerable frustration in spinal somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) measurements. The three mechanisms by which stimulus artefact is coupled into the measuring system are identified, and means for their reduction are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9246854     DOI: 10.1007/bf02530040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  10 in total

1.  Suppression of simulation artifacts from myoelectric-evoked potential recordings.

Authors:  M Knaflitz; R Merletti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  An electronic stimulus artifact suppressor.

Authors:  J A Freeman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-08

3.  Low noise alternating current amplifier and compensator to reduce stimulus artefact.

Authors:  V O Andersen; F Buchthal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1970-09

4.  Stimulus artifact reduction in nerve conduction.

Authors:  M J Kornfield; J Cerra; D G Simons
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  An automatic, optically isolated, biphasic constant current stimulator adapter for artefact suppression.

Authors:  H J Spencer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-02

6.  Stimulus artefact suppressor for EMG recording during FES by a constant-current stimulator.

Authors:  J Minzly; J Mizrahi; N Hakim; A Liberson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Instrumentation for ENG and EMG recordings in FES systems.

Authors:  Z M Nikolić; D B Popović; R B Stein; Z Kenwell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  On the nature and elimination of stimulus artifact in nerve signals evoked and recorded using surface electrodes.

Authors:  K C McGill; K L Cummins; L J Dorfman; B B Berlizot; K Leutkemeyer; D G Nishimura; B Widrow
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  A sample and hold amplifier system for stimulus artifact suppression.

Authors:  T L Babb; E Mariani; G M Strain; J P Lieb; H V Soper; P H Crandall
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-04

10.  A simplified circuit for stimulus artifact suppression.

Authors:  R J Roby
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-07
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Factors affecting the stimulus artifact tail in surface-recorded somatosensory-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Y Hua; D F Lovely; R Doraiswami
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

3.  Convergence characteristics of two algorithms in non-linear stimulus artefact cancellation for electrically evoked potential enhancement.

Authors:  V Parsa; P Parker; R Scott
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.602

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.