Literature DB >> 22915670

Sexes suffer from suboptimal lifespan because of genetic conflict in a seed beetle.

Elena C Berg1, Alexei A Maklakov.   

Abstract

Males and females have different routes to successful reproduction, resulting in sex differences in lifespan and age-specific allocation of reproductive effort. The trade-off between current and future reproduction is often resolved differently by males and females, and both sexes can be constrained in their ability to reach their sex-specific optima owing to intralocus sexual conflict. Such genetic antagonism may have profound implications for evolution, but its role in ageing and lifespan remains unresolved. We provide direct experimental evidence that males live longer and females live shorter than necessary to maximize their relative fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus seed beetles. Using artificial selection in a genetically heterogeneous population, we created replicate long-life lines where males lived on average 27 per cent longer than in short-life lines. As predicted by theory, subsequent assays revealed that upward selection on male lifespan decreased relative male fitness but increased relative female fitness compared with downward selection. Thus, we demonstrate that lifespan-extending genes can help one sex while harming the other. Our results show that sexual antagonism constrains adaptive life-history evolution, support a novel way of maintaining genetic variation for lifespan and argue for better integration of sex effects into applied research programmes aimed at lifespan extension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22915670      PMCID: PMC3441075          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  39 in total

Review 1.  Advice to an aging scientist.

Authors:  Daniel E L Promislow; Scott D Pletcher
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 5.432

2.  Mate choice, sexual conflict, and evolution of senescence.

Authors:  Daniel Promislow
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Age-specific metabolic rates and mortality rates in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel E L Promislow; Tamara S Haselkorn
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.304

4.  Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness.

Authors:  Kenneth M Fedorka; Timothy A Mousseau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Longevity and metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster: genetic correlations between life span and age-specific metabolic rate in populations artificially selected for long life.

Authors:  Aziz A Khazaeli; Wayne Van Voorhies; James W Curtsinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong?

Authors:  Joe Hereford; Thomas F Hansen; David Houle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Genetic and environmental conditions that increase longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans decrease metabolic rate.

Authors:  W A Van Voorhies; S Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Complex genetic architecture of population differences in adult lifespan of a beetle: nonadditive inheritance, gender differences, body size and a large maternal effect.

Authors:  C W Fox; M E Czesak; W G Wallin
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Uncoupled and surviving: individual mice with high metabolism have greater mitochondrial uncoupling and live longer.

Authors:  John R Speakman; Darren A Talbot; Colin Selman; Sam Snart; Jane S McLaren; Paula Redman; Ela Krol; Diane M Jackson; Maria S Johnson; Martin D Brand
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.304

10.  Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.

Authors:  A K Chippindale; J R Gibson; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  21 in total

1.  Transgenerational effects of maternal sexual interactions in seed beetles.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Damian K Dowling; Megan L Head; Eduardo Rodriguez-Exposito; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Sexual conflict, life span, and aging.

Authors:  Margo I Adler; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Potential for sexual conflict assessed via testosterone-mediated transcriptional changes in liver and muscle of a songbird.

Authors:  Mark P Peterson; Kimberly A Rosvall; Charlene A Taylor; Jacqueline Ann Lopez; Jeong-Hyeon Choi; Charles Ziegenfus; Haixu Tang; John K Colbourne; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  The effect of epistasis on sexually antagonistic genetic variation.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Nikolas Vellnow; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Inbreeding alters intersexual fitness correlations in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Eoin Duffy; Richa Joag; Jacek Radwan; Nina Wedell; David J Hosken
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The influence of mitonuclear genetic variation on personality in seed beetles.

Authors:  Hanne Løvlie; Elina Immonen; Emil Gustavsson; Erem Kazancioğlu; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Reduced costs of reproduction in females mediate a shift from a male-biased to a female-biased lifespan in humans.

Authors:  Elisabeth Bolund; Virpi Lummaa; Ken R Smith; Heidi A Hanson; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sexually antagonistic selection on genetic variation underlying both male and female same-sex sexual behavior.

Authors:  David Berger; Tao You; Maravillas R Minano; Karl Grieshop; Martin I Lind; Göran Arnqvist; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Evolutionary ecology of aging: time to reconcile field and laboratory research.

Authors:  Martin Reichard
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.