Literature DB >> 12683524

Genetic architecture of differences between populations of cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) evolved in the same environment.

Jonas Bieri1, Tadeusz J Kawecki.   

Abstract

We investigated the genetic architecture underlying differentiation in fitness-related traits between two pairs of populations of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). These populations had geographically distant (> 2000 km) origins but evolved in a uniform laboratory environment for 120 generations. For each pair of populations (Nigeria x Yemen and Cameroon x Uganda) we estimated the means of five fitness-related characters and a measure of fitness (net reproductive rate R0) in each of the parental populations and 12 types of hybrids (two F1 and two F2 lines and eight backcrosses). Models containing up to nine composite genetic parameters were fitted to the means of the 14 lines. The patterns of line means for all traits in the Nigeria x Yemen cross and for four traits (larval survival, developmental rate, female body weight, and fecundity) in the Cameroon x Uganda cross were best explained by models including additive, dominance, and maternal effects, but excluding epistasis. We did not find any evidence for outbreeding depression for any trait. An epistatic component of divergence was detected for egg hatching success and R0 in the Cameroon x Uganda cross, but its sign was opposite to that expected under outbreeding depression, that is, additive x additive epistasis had a positive effect on the performance of F2 hybrids. All traits except fecundity showed a pattern of heterosis. A large difference of egg-hatching success between the two reciprocal F1 lines in that cross was best explained as fertilization incompatibility between Cameroon females and sperm carrying Uganda genes. The results suggest that these populations have not converged to the same life-history phenotype and genetic architecture, despite 120 generations of uniform natural selection. However, the absence of outbreeding depression implies that they did not evolve toward different adaptive peaks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12683524     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00262.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Epistasis in natural populations of a predominantly selfing plant.

Authors:  S Volis; I Shulgina; M Zaretsky; O Koren
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genetic architecture underlying host choice differentiation in the sympatric host races of Lochmaea capreae leaf beetles.

Authors:  Shaghayegh Soudi; Klaus Reinhold; Leif Engqvist
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Quantitative genetics of functional characters in Drosophila melanogaster populations subjected to laboratory selection.

Authors:  Henrique Teotónio; Margarida Matos; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Environmental effects on sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Genetic architecture underlying convergent evolution of egg-laying behavior in a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  Charles W Fox; James D Wagner; Sara Cline; Frances Ann Thomas; Frank J Messina
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Genetically based population divergence in overwintering energy mobilization in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis).

Authors:  Amélie Crespel; Louis Bernatchez; Dany Garant; Céline Audet
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Genetic architecture underlying morning and evening circadian phenotypes in fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K M Vaze; K L Nikhil; V K Sharma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Phenotypic plasticity in a complex world: interactive effects of food and temperature on fitness components of a seed beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; William G Wallin; Lisa J Hitchcock; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Laboratory selection quickly erases historical differentiation.

Authors:  Inês Fragata; Pedro Simões; Miguel Lopes-Cunha; Margarida Lima; Bárbara Kellen; Margarida Bárbaro; Josiane Santos; Michael R Rose; Mauro Santos; Margarida Matos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.