Literature DB >> 2001931

Fixation characteristics in macular disease. Relationship between saccadic frequency, sequencing, and reading rate.

T T McMahon1, M Hansen, M Viana.   

Abstract

The relationship between reading rate and saccadic frequency in patients with macular degeneration was studied to determine if this simple measure of eye movements would be helpful in explaining the reduction in reading rates. Nineteen subjects and five controls were tested for visual acuity, reading rate, and saccadic frequency for intended stationary, simple left-to-right, and sequencing step tasks. Eye movements were recorded using an electro-oculography technique. Absolute eye position was not known. The results demonstrated that, using a 2 degree threshold for a stationary target, patients refixated a mean of 42.7 times per min, and controls refixated 0.00 times per min. For a two-letter left-to-right task, patients averaged 3.57 times more saccades than an ideal response, and controls had 1.14 times more saccades than ideal (P less than 0.01). For a five-letter left-to-right sequencing task, patients refixated a mean of 2.10 times more than ideal, and controls refixated 1.15 times more than ideal (P less than 0.05). Regression analysis demonstrated that sequencing task scores of saccadic frequency and visual acuity were the best predictors of reading rate (r2 = 0.705). These results indicate that higher saccadic frequencies are associated with lower reading rates and that there appears to be a relationship between the sequencing of visual information and reading rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2001931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  15 in total

1.  Relationship between oculomotor scanning determined by the DEM test and a contextual reading test in schoolchildren with reading difficulties.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo-Alvarez; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Impact of simulated micro-scotomas on reading performance in central and peripheral retina.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Krishnan; Hope M Queener; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  The Preferred Retinal Locus Used to Watch Videos.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Sidika Kajtezovic; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Reading performance and central field loss.

Authors:  E Kanonidou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Pediatric ophthalmology and childhood reading difficulties: Amblyopia and slow reading.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Krista R Kelly
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Simulation of a central scotoma using contact lenses with an opaque centre.

Authors:  Essam S Almutleb; Arthur Bradley; Jason Jedlicka; Shirin E Hassan
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Parafoveal vision impairments and their influence on reading performance and self-evaluated reading abilities.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Caroline Wagenbreth; Susann Sgorzaly; Gabriele H Franke; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Amblyopic children read more slowly than controls under natural, binocular reading conditions.

Authors:  Krista R Kelly; Reed M Jost; Angie De La Cruz; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  Relationship between slow visual processing and reading speed in people with macular degeneration.

Authors:  Allen M Y Cheong; Gordon E Legge; Mary G Lawrence; Sing-Hang Cheung; Mary A Ruff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Relationship between visual span and reading performance in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Allen M Y Cheong; Gordon E Legge; Mary G Lawrence; Sing-Hang Cheung; Mary A Ruff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.