Literature DB >> 20157824

Parafoveal vision impairments and their influence on reading performance and self-evaluated reading abilities.

Carolin Gall1, Caroline Wagenbreth, Susann Sgorzaly, Gabriele H Franke, Bernhard A Sabel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Patients with homonymous hemianopic field defects (HFD) after postchiasmatic cerebral brain injuries often complain about impairments in daily life activities, particularly problems in reading, and show considerable reductions of vision-related quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to assess the relation of "objective" reading performance and self-reported "subjective" reading abilities; it was further investigated whether parafoveal HFD characteristics have an impact on both parameters.
METHODS: In postchiasmatic-lesioned subjects with HFD (n = 43), "objective" reading performance was measured with Radner-Reading-Charts (reading speed, reading acuity). Vision-related QoL was assessed by the National-Eye-Institute-Visual-Function-Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). Four reading-relevant NEI-VFQ items that assessed "subjective" reading abilities were separately analyzed. Macular sparing measures were derived from campimetry (+/-16 degrees vertical, +/-21.5 degrees horizontal); i.e., the vertical HFD border between +/-2 degrees and the proportion of intact parafoveal visual field within the "reading window". Since macular sparing may be a perimetric artefact, eye movements during campimetry were recorded in 26 subjects.
RESULTS: Mean reading speed of the total sample (90.72 +/- 33.96 words per minute) was considerably reduced, as was the patients' vision-related QoL, which was revealed by diminished NEI-VFQ scores. Reading acuity was 0.12 +/- 0.13 LogRAD (0.81 +/- 0.26 according to the decimal system). There were significant but weak correlations between reading acuity and speed with all reading-relevant NEI-VFQ-items (r-range, reading acuity: -0.57 to -0.38, reading speed: 0.33 to 0.43) and 7/12 NEI-VFQ-subscales (r-range, reading acuity: -0.47 to -0.33, reading speed: 0.31 to 0.40). The intact parafoveal visual field correlated significantly with 2/4 reading-related NEI-VFQ-items and with 4/12 NEI-VFQ-subscales (r-range 0.31 to 0.52). Reading acuity and mean reading speed were both correlated with fixation accuracy during campimetry (r = -0.38 and 0.45). Correlations of spared areas between +2 degrees to -2 degrees and the relative and absolute defect HFD border with reading speed, but not reading acuity, tended to significance. Subjects deviated from the campimetric fixation mark in a SD-range of +/-5.2 degrees vertically and +/-6.5 degrees horizontally but eye movement ranges were not correlated with macular sparing measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFD showed severely reduced reading speed, which was reflected in subjectively diminished reading performance, and reduced reading-related QoL parameters. Larger areas of functionally intact parafoveal vision were associated with better reading performance. Although eye movements occurred during campimetry, these did not seem to constitute an artificially enlarged area of parafoveal intact vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20157824     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-009-1296-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  26 in total

1.  Are the benefits of sentence context different in central and peripheral vision?

Authors:  E M Fine; C A Hazel; K L Petre; G S Rubin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VIGILANCE.

Authors:  N H MACKWORTH; I T KAPLAN; W METLAY
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1964-04

3.  Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopial II. Oculomotor mechanisms.

Authors:  M M GASSEL; D WILLIAMS
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M Mangione; P P Lee; P R Gutierrez; K Spritzer; S Berry; R D Hays
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

5.  Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect.

Authors:  B Wilson; J Cockburn; P Halligan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Eye movements in reading with hemianopic field defects: the significance of clinical parameters.

Authors:  S Trauzettel-Klosinski; K Brendler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Neglect and hemianopia superimposed.

Authors:  Eva M Müller-Oehring; Erich Kasten; Dorothe A Poggel; Tilman Schulte; Hans Strasburger; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.475

9.  The vertical field border in hemianopia and its significance for fixation and reading.

Authors:  S Trauzettel-Klosinski; J Reinhard
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  [Visual field defects after cerebral lesions from the patient's perspective: health- and vision-related quality of life assessed by SF-36 and NEI-VFQ].

Authors:  C Gall; I Mueller; C Kaufmann; G H Franke; B A Sabel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.214

View more
  4 in total

1.  Subjective perception versus objective outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab for exudative AMD.

Authors:  Konrad R Koch; Philipp S Muether; Manuel M Hermann; Robert Hoerster; Bernd Kirchhof; Sascha Fauser
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  VeRSE: Vertical Reading Strategy Efficacy for Homonymous Hemianopia after Stroke: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Lauren Hepworth; Fiona Rowe; Heather Waterman
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2019-03-15

3.  Homonymous Visual Field Loss and Its Impact on Visual Exploration: A Supermarket Study.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Katrin Sippel; Martin Heister; Katrin Aehling; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Ulrich Schiefer; Elena Papageorgiou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Cluster Formation for Analyses of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Central 10-2 Visual Field in Normal Tension Glaucoma Eyes.

Authors:  Hirotaka Suzumura; Keiji Yoshikawa; Tairo Kimura; Mami Nanno; Toyoaki Tsumura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.