Literature DB >> 18191983

Relationship between visual span and reading performance in age-related macular degeneration.

Allen M Y Cheong1, Gordon E Legge, Mary G Lawrence, Sing-Hang Cheung, Mary A Ruff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Visual-span profiles are plots of letter-recognition accuracy as a function of letter position left and right of the point of fixation. Legge, Mansfield, and Chung [Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S., & Chung, S. T. L. (2001). Psychophysics of reading-XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 41(6), 725-743] proposed that reduced size of the visual span is a spatial factor limiting reading speed in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We have recently shown that a temporal property of letter recognition--the exposure time required for a high level of accuracy--is also a factor limiting reading speed in AMD [Cheong, A. M. Y., Legge, G. E., Lawrence, M. G., Cheung, S. H., & Ruff, M. (2007). Relationship between slow visual processing and reading speed in people with macular degeneration. Vision Research, 47, 2943-2965]. We measured the visual-span profiles of AMD subjects and assessed the relationship of the spatial and temporal properties of these profiles to reading speed.
METHODS: Thirteen AMD subjects and 11 age-matched normals were tested. Visual-span profiles were measured by using the trigram letter-recognition method described by Legge et al. (2001). Each individual's temporal threshold for letter recognition (80% accuracy criterion) was used as the exposure time for measuring the visual-span profile. Size of the visual span was computed as the area under the profile in bits of information transmitted. The information transfer rate in bits per second was defined as the visual-span size in bits divided by the exposure time in sec.
RESULTS: AMD visual-span sizes were substantially smaller (median of 23.9 bits) than normal visual-span sizes in central vision (median of 40.8 bits, p<.01). For the nine AMD subjects with eccentric fixation, the visual-span sizes (median of 20.6 bits) were also significantly smaller than visual spans of normal controls at 10 degrees below fixation in peripheral vision (median of 29.0 bits, p=.01). Information transfer rate for the AMD subjects (median of 29.5 bits/s) was significantly slower than that for the age-matched normals at both central and peripheral vision (median of 411.7 and 290.5 bits/s respectively, ps<.01). Information transfer rates were more strongly correlated with reading speed than the size of the visual span, and explained 36% of the variance in AMD reading speed.
CONCLUSION: Both visual-span size and information transfer rate were significantly impaired in the AMD subjects compared with age-matched normals. Information transfer rate, representing the combined effects of a reduced visual span and slower temporal processing of letters, was a better predictor of reading speed in AMD subjects than was the size of the visual span.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18191983      PMCID: PMC2323914          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  40 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge; Sing-hang Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Processing determinants of reading speed.

Authors:  M D Jackson; L McClelland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1979-06

5.  Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery.

Authors:  R J Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Psychophysics of reading--I. Normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; D G Pelli; G S Rubin; M M Schleske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Psychophysics of reading--II. Low vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; G S Rubin; D G Pelli; M M Schleske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Fixation stability and reading speed in patients with newly developed macular disease.

Authors:  Michael D Crossland; Louise E Culham; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Reading with a macular scotoma. I. Retinal location of scotoma and fixation area.

Authors:  G T Timberlake; M A Mainster; E Peli; R A Augliere; E A Essock; L E Arend
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Computerized quantitative analysis of kinetic visual fields.

Authors:  R G Weleber; W R Tobler
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  25 in total

1.  Training peripheral vision to read: Boosting the speed of letter processing.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Wagoner; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Comparing the visual spans for faces and letters.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Jennifer M Scholz; Rachel Gage; Christopher S Kallie; Tingting Liu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Slow Reading in Glaucoma: Is it due to the Shrinking Visual Span in Central Vision?

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; Christopher Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Xuanzi He; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The Impact of Progressive Visual Field Constriction on Reading Ability in an Inherited Retinal Degeneration.

Authors:  Jasleen K Jolly; Clare E Couldridge-Smith; Kanmin Xue; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Training improves reading speed in peripheral vision: is it due to attention?

Authors:  Hye-Won Lee; Miyoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge; Joshua J Gefroh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Enhancing visual performance for people with central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Relationship between slow visual processing and reading speed in people with macular degeneration.

Authors:  Allen M Y Cheong; Gordon E Legge; Mary G Lawrence; Sing-Hang Cheung; Mary A Ruff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Reading Digital with Low Vision.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Visible Lang       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.