Literature DB >> 29265475

Simulation of a central scotoma using contact lenses with an opaque centre.

Essam S Almutleb1,2, Arthur Bradley1, Jason Jedlicka1, Shirin E Hassan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility of using soft contact lenses (CLs) with an opaque centre to induce absolute central scotomas that move with the eye. We examined the geometrical optics prediction that scotoma size will vary with the size of the CL's opaque centre and with ocular pupil size. We also tested the hypothesis that high environmental light levels will ensure that the ocular pupil will remain small enough, even with opaque centre CLs, to generate absolute scotomas representative of those experienced by patients with age-related macular disease.
METHODS: Using an Octopus 900 Perimeter ( www.Haag-Streit.com), kinetic visual fields (VFs) were measured in five normally-sighted subjects using a V4e Goldmann target with CLs that had central opaque areas with diameters of 2.8, 3.0, and 3.2 mm. To control pupil size, VFs were measured with background perimeter bowl luminances of 10, 585, and 1155 cd m-2 . Subjects attempted to (i) fixate the bowl centre; and (ii) place the scotoma edge at the bowl fixation target (eccentric viewing).
RESULTS: As predicted, there was a direct relationship between scotoma size and both luminance level and diameter of the opacity. Mean scotoma diameters were 0°, 17.6° and 22°, for the low, medium and high bowl luminances, respectively. Scotoma size was determined primarily by the difference between the diameters of CL opacity and the entrance pupil of the eye and the axial separation between them, and between-subject differences in pupil diameters contributed most to the between-subject variability in scotoma diameter at each light level (SD: 6.01°). Scotoma displacement during eccentric fixation confirmed the gaze-contingent characteristics of this experimental model.
CONCLUSION: It is possible to induce a gaze-contingent absolute scotoma and hence mimic central vision loss using centrally-opaque CLs provided that the CL opacity is larger than the entrance pupil of the eye. This simulation tool will, therefore, be ineffective at low environmental light levels (as shown previously) if the entrance pupil of the eye is larger than the CL opacity.
© 2017 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2017 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age-related macular degeneration (AMD); contact lenses; experimental AMD model; low vision; simulated central scotoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29265475      PMCID: PMC5744893          DOI: 10.1111/opo.12422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  56 in total

1.  Effects of cataract and scotoma on visual acuity: a simulation study.

Authors:  E M Fine; G S Rubin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Do small-aperture presbyopic corrections influence the visual field?

Authors:  David A Atchison; Stella Blazaki; Marwan Suheimat; Sotiris Plainis; W Neil Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Seeing for yourself: feasibility study towards valuing visual impairment using simulation spectacles.

Authors:  Samuel Aballéa; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Scotoma mapping by semi-automated kinetic perimetry: the effects of stimulus properties and the speed of subjects' responses.

Authors:  Jan Dolderer; Reinhard Vonthein; Chris A Johnson; Ulrich Schiefer; William Hart
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2006-06

5.  Effect of pupil size on dynamic visual acuity.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ueda; Yoshiaki Nawa; Masahiro Okamoto; Yoshiaki Hara
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2007-02

6.  Statistics in brief: the importance of sample size in the planning and interpretation of medical research.

Authors:  David Jean Biau; Solen Kernéis; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Anxiety and depression prevalence rates in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Albert Augustin; José-Alain Sahel; Francesco Bandello; Roland Dardennes; Frédérique Maurel; Cristina Negrini; Klaus Hieke; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Impairment of visual memory for objects in natural scenes by simulated central scotomata.

Authors:  Franziska Geringswald; Eleonora Porracin; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Simulation contact lenses for AMD health state utility values in NICE appraisals: a different reality.

Authors:  Thomas Butt; Michael D Crossland; Peter West; Shepley W Orr; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  4 in total

1.  A simple method for comparing peripheral and central color vision by means of two smartphones.

Authors:  Galina Rozhkova; Alexander Belokopytov; Maria Gracheva; Egor Ershov; Petr Nikolaev
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-08

2.  Retinal defocus in myopes wearing dual-focus zonal contact lenses.

Authors:  Neeraj K Singh; Dawn Meyer; Matt Jaskulski; Pete Kollbaum
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 3.992

3.  The Effect of Simulated Central Field Loss on Street-crossing Decision-Making in Young Adult Pedestrians.

Authors:  Essam S Almutleb; Shirin E Hassan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.106

4.  Using eye movements to detect visual field loss: a pragmatic assessment using simulated scotoma.

Authors:  Daniel S Asfaw; Pete R Jones; Laura A Edwards; Nicholas D Smith; David P Crabb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.