Literature DB >> 20019173

Investigation of the effect of anode/filter materials on the dose and image quality of a digital mammography system based on an amorphous selenium flat panel detector.

P Baldelli1, N Phelan, G Egan.   

Abstract

A comparison, in terms of image quality and glandular breast dose, was carried out between two similar digital mammography systems using amorphous selenium flat panel detectors. The two digital mammography systems currently available from Lorad-Hologic were compared. The original system utilises Mo/Mo and Mo/Rh as target/filter combinations, while the new system uses W/Rh and W/Ag. Images of multiple mammography phantoms with simulated compressed breast thicknesses of 4 cm, 5 cm and 6 cm and various glandular tissue equivalency were acquired under different spectral conditions. The contrast of five details, corresponding to five glandular compositions, was calculated and the ratio of the square of the contrast-to-noise ratio to the average glandular dose was used as a figure-of-merit (FOM) to compare results. For each phantom thickness and target/filter combination, there is an optimum voltage that maximises the FOM. Results show that the W/Rh combination is the best choice for all the detection tasks studied, but for thicknesses greater than 6 cm the W/Ag combination would probably be the best choice. In addition, the new system with W filter presents a better optimisation of the automatic exposure control in comparison with the original system with Mo filter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20019173      PMCID: PMC3473454          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/60404532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

1.  Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  D R Dance; A K Thilander; M Sandborg; C L Skinner; I A Castellano; G A Carlsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.

Authors:  D R Dance; C L Skinner; K C Young; J R Beckett; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.

Authors:  Philipp Bernhardt; Thomas Mertelmeier; Martin Hoheisel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.

Authors:  Paula Toroi; Federica Zanca; Kenneth C Young; Chantal van Ongeval; Guy Marchal; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Priya Raghunathan; Mitali J More; J Anthony Seibert; Alexander Kwan; Joseph Y Lo; Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Laurie L Fajardo; Allen McGruder; Sandra M McGruder; Andrew D A Maidment; Martin J Yaffe; Aili Bloomquist; Gordon E Mawdsley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A model for optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography.

Authors:  R Fahrig; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type.

Authors:  R Fahrig; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.071

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Comparison of the clinical performance of three digital mammography systems in a breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  E Keavey; N Phelan; A M O'Connell; F Flanagan; A O'Doherty; A Larke; A M Connors
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of mean glandular dose and modulation transfer function for different tube potentials and target-filter combinations in computed radiography mammography.

Authors:  Siti Aishah Abdul Aziz; Abdul Khaliq Mohd Saparudin; Ahmad Zaky Harun
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2013-05

3.  Mammographic density measurements are not affected by mammography system.

Authors:  Christine N Damases; Patrick C Brennan; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-03-04

4.  Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme.

Authors:  J B McCullagh; P Baldelli; N Phelan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Determination of Tube Output (kVp) and Exposure Mode for Breast Phantom of Various Thicknesses/Glandularity for Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Kamal Izdihar; Kumari Chelliah Kanaga; Vijayalakshimi Krishnapillai; Tamanang Sulaiman
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

6.  Estimates of Average Glandular Dose with Auto-modes of X-ray Exposures in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Izdihar Kamal; Kanaga K Chelliah; Nawal Mustafa
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2015-05-28

7.  Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.

Authors:  Suman Shrestha; Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Assessment of Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography System with Different Anode-Filter Combinations Using MCNP Code.

Authors:  Lida Gholamkar; Ali Asghar Mowlavi; Mahdi Sadeghi; Mitra Athari
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 0.212

9.  Comparison of new and established full-field digital mammography systems in diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Eun Sook Ko; Boo-Kyung Han; Sun Mi Kim; Eun Young Ko; Mijung Jang; Chae Yeon Lyou; Jung Min Chang; Woo Kyung Moon; Rock Bum Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Effect of anode/filter combination on average glandular dose in mammography.

Authors:  Michał Biegała; Teresa Jakubowska; Karolina Markowska
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.