Literature DB >> 25892949

Determination of Tube Output (kVp) and Exposure Mode for Breast Phantom of Various Thicknesses/Glandularity for Digital Mammography.

Kamal Izdihar1, Kumari Chelliah Kanaga1, Vijayalakshimi Krishnapillai2, Tamanang Sulaiman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimisation of average glandular dose (AGD) for two-dimensional (2D) mammography is important, as imaging using ionizing radiation has the probability to induce cancer resulting from stochastic effects. This study aims to observe the effects of kVp, anode/filter material, and exposure mode on the dose and image quality of 2D mammography.
METHODS: This experimental study was conducted using full-field digital mammography. The entrance surface air kerma was determined using thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) 100H and ionization chamber (IC) on three types of Computerized Imaging Reference System (CIRS) phantom with 50/50, 30/70, and 20/80 breast glandularity, respectively, in the auto-time mode and auto-filter mode. The Euref protocol was used to calculate the AGD while the image quality was evaluated using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM), and image quality figure (IQF).
RESULTS: It is shown that AGD values in the auto-time mode did not decrease significantly with the increasing tube voltage of the silver filter (r = -0.187, P > 0.05) and rhodium filter (r = -0.131, P > 0.05) for all the phantoms. The general linear model showed that AGD for all phantoms had a significant effect between different exposure factors [F (6,12.3) = 4.48 and mode of exposure F (1,86) = 4.17, P < 0.05, respectively] but there is no significant difference between the different anode/filter combination [F (1,4) = 0.571].
CONCLUSION: In summary, the 28, 29, and 31 kVp are the optimum kVp for 50%, 30%, and 20% breast glandularity, respectively. Besides the auto-filter mode is suitable for 50%, 30%, and 20% breast glandularity because it is automatic, faster, and may avoid error done by the operator.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDMAM; digital mammography; radiation dose

Year:  2015        PMID: 25892949      PMCID: PMC4390773     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays J Med Sci        ISSN: 1394-195X


  13 in total

1.  Mammographic image quality and exposure in South East Asia.

Authors:  K H Ng; L A DeWerd; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.430

2.  Mailed thermoluminescent dosimeter determination of entrance skin exposure and half-value layer in mammography.

Authors:  J F Wochos; G D Fullerton; L A DeWerd
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.

Authors:  D R Dance; C L Skinner; K C Young; J R Beckett; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  The use of a figure-of-merit (FOM) for optimisation in digital mammography: a literature review.

Authors:  M Borg; I Badr; G J Royle
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose.

Authors:  D R Dance
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.

Authors:  D R Dance; K C Young; R E van Engen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Study of digital mammographic equipments by phantom image quality.

Authors:  P Mayo; F Rodenas; G Verdú; J M Campayo; J I Villaescusa
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2006

8.  A critical comparison of three full field digital mammography systems using figure of merit.

Authors:  K C Kanaga; H H Yap; S E Laila; T Sulaiman; M Zaharah; A A Shantini
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  2010-06

9.  Investigation of the effect of anode/filter materials on the dose and image quality of a digital mammography system based on an amorphous selenium flat panel detector.

Authors:  P Baldelli; N Phelan; G Egan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Effect of automatic kV selection on dose and contrast for a mammographic X-ray system.

Authors:  K C Young; M L Ramsdale; A Rust; J Cooke
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimates of Average Glandular Dose with Auto-modes of X-ray Exposures in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Izdihar Kamal; Kanaga K Chelliah; Nawal Mustafa
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2015-05-28

2.  Investigation of Exposure Factors for Various Breast Composition and Thicknesses in Digital Screening Mammography Related to Breast Dose.

Authors:  Khaled Alkhalifah; Ajit Brindhaban
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women.

Authors:  Mika Yamamuro; Yoshiyuki Asai; Naomi Hashimoto; Nao Yasuda; Yoshiaki Ozaki; Kazunari Ishii; Yongbum Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.