Literature DB >> 7838059

Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type.

R Fahrig1, M J Yaffe.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that breast cancer detection can be improved through the use of digital mammography. It is hypothesized that the choice of proper shape of the x-ray spectrum incident upon the breast can yield an improved image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a given dose. To test this hypothesis, an energy transport model incorporating measured breast tissue attenuation coefficients and published exposure-to-dose conversion values was developed to describe the image acquisition process. The choice of applied kilovoltage and filter for Mo and W target x-ray sources has been optimized with respect to SNR and absorbed dose for detectors based on a Gd2O2S scintillating screen under the conditions of perfect coupling of light between the screen and a solid state photodetector. For the W spectra, the optimum filter-kVp combinations could provide 41%, 13%, and 42% improvements in SNR for 2-cm, 6-cm and 8-cm breasts, respectively, over the conventional Mo filtration, for a practical imaging time of 1.0 s. W and Mo spectra produce similar SNR values for a given filter thickness except for the 4-cm breast. Given the limitations of current technology, however, the W spectra produce the optimum SNRs in a shorter imaging time for breast thicknesses greater than and less than 4 cm. The maximum SNR for imaging both infiltrating ductal carcinoma and calcifications is provided by the same filter-kVp combination, allowing optimization based on breast thickness and composition only. The model can now be used to compare and improve upon novel detector designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7838059     DOI: 10.1118/1.597191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Modulator design for x-ray scatter correction using primary modulation: material selection.

Authors:  Hewei Gao; Lei Zhu; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.

Authors:  Paula Toroi; Federica Zanca; Kenneth C Young; Chantal van Ongeval; Guy Marchal; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Investigation of the effect of anode/filter materials on the dose and image quality of a digital mammography system based on an amorphous selenium flat panel detector.

Authors:  P Baldelli; N Phelan; G Egan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Energy weighting improves dose efficiency in clinical practice: implementation on a spectral photon-counting mammography system.

Authors:  Johan Berglund; Henrik Johansson; Mats Lundqvist; Björn Cederström; Erik Fredenberg
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-08-28

5.  Ideal-observer detectability in photon-counting differential phase-contrast imaging using a linear-systems approach.

Authors:  Erik Fredenberg; Mats Danielsson; J Webster Stayman; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Magnus Aslund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Determination of linear x-ray attenuation coefficients of pathological brain tissues and use of filters in tissue contrast enhancement in computed tomography.

Authors:  M Erdem Sagsoz; Fazlı Erdogan; Salih Z Erzeneoglu; İhsan Yuce
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2010-08

7.  Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Fibrofatty Breast using Target/filter Combinations in Two Digital Mammography Systems.

Authors:  Khaled Alkhalifah; Akram Asbeutah; Ajit Brindhaban
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-09-07

8.  Patient dose in full-field digital mammography: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Paola Baldelli; Angelo Taibi; Cosimo Di Maggio; Mauro Gambaccini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  Comparison between Recorded and Measured Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Full-field Digital Mammography: A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Akram Mahmoud Asbeutah; Ajit Brindhaban
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-11-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.