Literature DB >> 20016902

Image-based clinical decision support for transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine.

Hak Jong Lee1, Sung Il Hwang, Seok-Min Han, Seong Ho Park, Seung Hyup Kim, Jeong Yeon Cho, Chang Gyu Seong, Gheeyoung Choe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We developed a multiple logistic regression model, an artificial neural network (ANN), and a support vector machine (SVM) model to predict the outcome of a prostate biopsy, and compared the accuracies of each model.
METHOD: One thousand and seventy-seven consecutive patients who had undergone transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy were enrolled in the study. Clinical decision models were constructed from the input data of age, digital rectal examination findings, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), PSAD in transitional zone, and TRUS findings. The patients were divided into the training and test groups in a randomized fashion. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC, Az) were calculated to summarize the overall performance of each decision model for the task of prostate cancer prediction.
RESULTS: The Az values of the ROC curves for the use of multiple logistic regression analysis, ANN, and the SVM were 0.768, 0.778, and 0.847, respectively. Pairwise comparison of the ROC curves determined that the performance of the SVM was superior to that of the ANN or the multiple logistic regression model.
CONCLUSION: Image-based clinical decision support models allow patients to be informed of the actual probability of having a prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20016902     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1686-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  48 in total

Review 1.  Use of artificial neural networks in prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Errejon; E D Crawford; J Dayhoff; C O'Donnell; A Tewari; J Finkelstein; E J Gamito
Journal:  Mol Urol       Date:  2001

2.  Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  W J Catalona; A W Partin; K M Slawin; M K Brawer; R C Flanigan; A Patel; J P Richie; J B deKernion; P C Walsh; P T Scardino; P H Lange; E N Subong; R E Parson; G H Gasior; K G Loveland; P C Southwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Prostate cancer detection in men with serum PSA concentrations of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and benign prostate examination. Enhancement of specificity with free PSA measurements.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; D K Ornstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  T Loch; I Leuschner; C Genberg; K Weichert-Jacobsen; F Küppers; E Yfantis; M Evans; V Tsarev; M Stöckle
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  An artificial neural network considerably improves the diagnostic power of percent free prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer diagnosis: results of a 5-year investigation.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Klaus Jung; Henning Cammann; Birgit Vogel; Brigitte Brux; Glen Kristiansen; Birgit Rudolph; Steffen Hauptmann; Michael Lein; Dietmar Schnorr; Pranav Sinha; Stefan A Loening
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Multicenter evaluation of an artificial neural network to increase the prostate cancer detection rate and reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Henning Cammann; Axel Semjonow; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Leon F A Wymenga; Michael Lein; Pranav Sinha; Stefan A Loening; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Algorithms based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, digital rectal examination and prostate volume reduce false-positive PSA results in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Patrik Finne; Ralf Finne; Chris Bangma; Jonas Hugosson; Matti Hakama; Anssi Auvinen; Ulf-Håkan Stenman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Comparison of logistic regression and neural net modeling for prediction of prostate cancer pathologic stage.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Manisha Chaudhari; M Craig Miller; Edward C Poole; Gerard J O'Dowd; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  The distribution of prostate specific antigen in men without clinical or pathological evidence of prostate cancer: relationship to gland volume and age.

Authors:  R J Babaian; H Miyashita; R B Evans; E I Ramirez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  15 in total

1.  Pre-operative prediction of advanced prostatic cancer using clinical decision support systems: accuracy comparison between support vector machine and artificial neural network.

Authors:  Sang Youn Kim; Sung Kyoung Moon; Dae Chul Jung; Sung Il Hwang; Chang Kyu Sung; Jeong Yeon Cho; Seung Hyup Kim; Jiwon Lee; Hak Jong Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  Biomedical informatics and translational medicine.

Authors:  Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.531

3.  Predictive performances of 6 data mining techniques for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.

Authors:  Miao Luo; Yuan Feng; Jingying Luo; XiaoLin Li; JianFang Han; Taoping Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Prediction of medial tibiofemoral compartment joint space loss progression using volumetric cartilage measurements: Data from the FNIH OA biomarkers consortium.

Authors:  Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; David J Hunter; Erik B Dam; Bashir Zikria; C Kent Kwoh; Shadpour Demehri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Anatomic segmentation improves prostate cancer detection with artificial neural networks analysis of 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Lukasz Matulewicz; Jacobus F A Jansen; Louisa Bokacheva; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Samson W Fine; Amita Shukla-Dave; James A Eastham; Hedvig Hricak; Jason A Koutcher; Kristen L Zakian
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Predicting acupuncture efficacy for functional dyspepsia based on routine clinical features: a machine learning study in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Tao Yin; Hui Zheng; Tingting Ma; Xiaoping Tian; Jing Xu; Ying Li; Lei Lan; Mailan Liu; Ruirui Sun; Yong Tang; Fanrong Liang; Fang Zeng
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  Support vector machine model for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer with multidetector computed tomography: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Zhang; Zhi-Long Wang; Lei Tang; Ying-Shi Sun; Kun Cao; Yun Gao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Estimating the predictive ability of genetic risk models in simulated data based on published results from genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Suman Kundu; Raluca Mihaescu; Catherina M C Meijer; Rachel Bakker; A Cecile J W Janssens
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Risk prediction models for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score.

Authors:  Xin-Hai Hu; Henning Cammann; Hellmuth-A Meyer; Klaus Jung; Hong-Biao Lu; Natalia Leva; Ahmed Magheli; Carsten Stephan; Jonas Busch
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.

Authors:  Hesham Salem; Daniele Soria; Jonathan N Lund; Amir Awwad
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.