Literature DB >> 24243554

Anatomic segmentation improves prostate cancer detection with artificial neural networks analysis of 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

Lukasz Matulewicz1, Jacobus F A Jansen, Louisa Bokacheva, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Oguz Akin, Samson W Fine, Amita Shukla-Dave, James A Eastham, Hedvig Hricak, Jason A Koutcher, Kristen L Zakian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether an artificial neural network (ANN) model is a useful tool for automatic detection of cancerous voxels in the prostate from (1)H-MRSI datasets and whether the addition of information about anatomical segmentation improves the detection of cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and waived informed consent. Eighteen men with prostate cancer (median age, 55 years; range, 36-71 years) who underwent endorectal MRI/MRSI before radical prostatectomy were included in this study. These patients had at least one cancer area on whole-mount histopathological map and at least one matching MRSI voxel suspicious for cancer detected. Two ANN models for automatic classification of MRSI voxels in the prostate were implemented and compared: model 1, which used only spectra as input, and model 2, which used the spectra plus information from anatomical segmentation. The models were trained, tested and validated using spectra from voxels that the spectroscopist had designated as cancer and that were verified on histopathological maps.
RESULTS: At ROC analysis, model 2 (AUC = 0.968) provided significantly better (P = 0.03) classification of cancerous voxels than did model 1 (AUC = 0.949).
CONCLUSION: Automatic analysis of prostate MRSI to detect cancer using ANN model is feasible. Application of anatomical segmentation from MRI as an additional input to ANN improves the accuracy of detecting cancerous voxels from MRSI.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer-aided diagnosis; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; neural networks; pattern recognition; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24243554      PMCID: PMC4306557          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  35 in total

Review 1.  Artificial neural networks for diagnosis and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guido Schwarzer; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  2002-05

2.  Simultaneous Segmentation of Prostatic Zones Using Active Appearance Models With Multiple Coupled Levelsets.

Authors:  Robert Toth; Justin Ribault; John Gentile; Dan Sperling; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 3.  Pattern recognition approaches in biomedical and clinical magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a review.

Authors:  W el-Deredy
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Outcome prediction for prostate cancer detection rate with artificial neural network (ANN) in daily routine.

Authors:  Thorsten H Ecke; Peter Bartel; Steffen Hallmann; Stefan Koch; Jürgen Ruttloff; Henning Cammann; Michael Lein; Mark Schrader; Kurt Miller; Carsten Stephan
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Diagnostic assessment of brain tumours and non-neoplastic brain disorders in vivo using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  H Poptani; J Kaartinen; R K Gupta; M Niemitz; Y Hiltunen; R A Kauppinen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 Tesla endorectal, in vivo T2-weighted MR imagery.

Authors:  Satish E Viswanath; Nicholas B Bloch; Jonathan C Chappelow; Robert Toth; Neil M Rofsky; Elizabeth M Genega; Robert E Lenkinski; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Development, validation, and head-to-head comparison of logistic regression-based nomograms and artificial neural network models predicting prostate cancer on initial extended biopsy.

Authors:  Satoru Kawakami; Noboru Numao; Yuhei Okubo; Fumitaka Koga; Shinya Yamamoto; Kazutaka Saito; Yasuhisa Fujii; Junji Yonese; Hitoshi Masuda; Kazunori Kihara; Iwao Fukui
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  An artificial neural network to predict the outcome of repeat prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Theodore Anagnostou; Vincent Ravery; Alexandre Zlotta; Carsten Stephan; Michael Marberger; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The effect of experimental conditions on the detection of spermine in cell extracts and tissues.

Authors:  Nicholas G Spencer; Thomas R Eykyn; Nandita M deSouza; Geoffrey S Payne
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 10.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Steven A Leibel; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  6 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer with MRI.

Authors:  Baowei Fei
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09

2.  Detection of prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI utilizing the anatomic structure of the prostate.

Authors:  Jin Jin; Lin Zhang; Ethan Leng; Gregory J Metzger; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI: Technology and Applications.

Authors:  Lizhi Liu; Zhiqiang Tian; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Detection of Prostate Cancer: Quantitative Multiparametric MR Imaging Models Developed Using Registered Correlative Histopathology.

Authors:  Gregory J Metzger; Chaitanya Kalavagunta; Benjamin Spilseth; Patrick J Bolan; Xiufeng Li; Diane Hutter; Jung W Nam; Andrew D Johnson; Jonathan C Henriksen; Laura Moench; Badrinath Konety; Christopher A Warlick; Stephen C Schmechel; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Prostate MRSI predicts outcome in radical prostatectomy patients.

Authors:  Kristen L Zakian; William Hatfield; Omer Aras; Kun Cao; Derya Yakar; Debra A Goldman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Amita Shukla-Dave; Yousef Mazaheri Tehrani; Samson Fine; James Eastham; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.

Authors:  Hesham Salem; Daniele Soria; Jonathan N Lund; Amir Awwad
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.