Literature DB >> 9145717

Prostate cancer detection in men with serum PSA concentrations of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and benign prostate examination. Enhancement of specificity with free PSA measurements.

W J Catalona1, D S Smith, D K Ornstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the detection rate of prostate cancer in a screening population of men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and a benign prostate examination, to assess the clinicopathological features of the cancers detected, and to assess the usefulness of measuring the ratio of free to total PSA to reduce the number of prostatic biopsies.
DESIGN: A community-based study of serial screening for prostate cancer with serum PSA measurements and prostate examinations.
SETTING: University medical center.
SUBJECTS: A total of 914 consecutive screening volunteers aged 50 years or older with serum PSA levels of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL who had a benign prostate examination and no prior screening tests suspicious for prostate cancer, 332 (36%) of whom underwent biopsy of the prostate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer detection rate, clinical and pathological features of cancers detected, and specificity for cancer detection using measurements of percentage of free PSA.
RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 22% (73/332) of men who underwent biopsy. All cancers detected were clinically localized, and 81% (42/52) that were surgically staged were pathologically organ confined. Ten percent of the cancers were clinically low-volume and low-grade tumors, and 17% of those surgically staged were low-volume and low-grade or moderately low-grade tumors (possibly harmless). Using a percentage of free PSA cutoff of 27% or less as a criterion for performing prostatic biopsy would have detected 90% of cancers, avoided 18% of benign biopsies, and yielded a positive predictive value of 24% in men who underwent biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an appreciable rate of detectable prostate cancer in men with serum PSA levels of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL. The great majority of cancers detected have the features of medically important tumors. Free serum PSA measurements may reduce the number of additional biopsies required by the lower PSA cutoff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9145717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  105 in total

1.  Early detection and aggressive treatment of prostate cancer: groping in the dark.

Authors:  M J Barry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Prostate-specific antigen testing. Should we recommend it?

Authors:  John Hickey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  The role of prostate specific antigen in screening and management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Khurshid Guru; Ashutosh Tewari; Ashok K Hemal; John Wei; Javid Javidan; James Peabody; Mani Menon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  S R Gambert
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Complexed prostate-specific antigen improvement in detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Okihara; R J Babaian
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Patrick C Walsh; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Probability of an abnormal screening prostate-specific antigen result based on age, race, and prostate-specific antigen threshold.

Authors:  Roxanne Espaldon; Katharine A Kirby; Kathy Z Fung; Richard M Hoffman; Adam A Powell; Stephen J Freedland; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Image-based clinical decision support for transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine.

Authors:  Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Seok-Min Han; Seong Ho Park; Seung Hyup Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Chang Gyu Seong; Gheeyoung Choe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.