Literature DB >> 21927560

Pre-operative prediction of advanced prostatic cancer using clinical decision support systems: accuracy comparison between support vector machine and artificial neural network.

Sang Youn Kim1, Sung Kyoung Moon, Dae Chul Jung, Sung Il Hwang, Chang Kyu Sung, Jeong Yeon Cho, Seung Hyup Kim, Jiwon Lee, Hak Jong Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to develop support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for the pre-operative prediction of advanced prostate cancer by using the parameters acquired from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies, and to compare the accuracies between the two models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent prostate biopsies and prostatectomies for prostate cancer were divided into the training and test groups (n = 300 versus n = 232). From the data in the training group, two clinical decision support systems (CDSSs-[SVM and ANN]) were constructed with input (age, prostate specific antigen level, digital rectal examination, and five biopsy parameters) and output data (the probability for advanced prostate cancer [> pT3a]). From the data of the test group, the accuracy of output data was evaluated. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were calculated to summarize the overall performances, and a comparison of the ROC curves was performed (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: The AUC of SVM and ANN is 0.805 and 0.719, respectively (p = 0.020), in the pre-operative prediction of advanced prostate cancer.
CONCLUSION: The performance of SVM is superior to ANN in the pre-operative prediction of advanced prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision support systems, clinical; Medical order entry systems; Needle biopsy; Prostatic neoplasms; Staging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21927560      PMCID: PMC3168800          DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2011.12.5.588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Radiol        ISSN: 1229-6929            Impact factor:   3.500


  28 in total

Review 1.  Use of artificial neural networks in prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Errejon; E D Crawford; J Dayhoff; C O'Donnell; A Tewari; J Finkelstein; E J Gamito
Journal:  Mol Urol       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Support vector machines versus logistic regression: improving prospective performance in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  N L M M Pochet; J A K Suykens
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Development and external validation of an extended 10-core biopsy nomogram.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Alberto Briganti; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Christopher Porter; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea Gallina; Jochen Walz; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Andreas Erbersdobler; Thorsten Schlomm; Sascha A Ahyai; Eike Currlin; Luc Valiquette; Hans Heinzer; Patrizio Rigatti; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.

Authors:  Alexandre R Zlotta; Mesut Remzi; Peter B Snow; Claude C Schulman; Michael Marberger; Bob Djavan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  T Loch; I Leuschner; C Genberg; K Weichert-Jacobsen; F Küppers; E Yfantis; M Evans; V Tsarev; M Stöckle
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Predicting the extent of prostate cancer using the combination of systematic biopsy and serum prostate-specific antigen in Japanese men.

Authors:  K Gohji; M Okamoto; A Takenaka; M Nomi; A Fujii
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Support vector machines for diagnosis of breast tumors on US images.

Authors:  Ruey-Feng Chang; Wen-Jie Wu; Woo Kyung Moon; Yi-Hong Chou; Dar-Ren Chen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Multicenter evaluation of an artificial neural network to increase the prostate cancer detection rate and reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Henning Cammann; Axel Semjonow; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Leon F A Wymenga; Michael Lein; Pranav Sinha; Stefan A Loening; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Algorithms based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, digital rectal examination and prostate volume reduce false-positive PSA results in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Patrik Finne; Ralf Finne; Chris Bangma; Jonas Hugosson; Matti Hakama; Anssi Auvinen; Ulf-Håkan Stenman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Staging of prostate cancer using automatic feature selection, sampling and Dempster-Shafer fusion.

Authors:  Sandeep Chandana; Henry Leung; Kiril Trpkov
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2009-02-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  Pre-operative prediction of surgical morbidity in children: comparison of five statistical models.

Authors:  Jennifer N Cooper; Lai Wei; Soledad A Fernandez; Peter C Minneci; Katherine J Deans
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation?

Authors:  Young Jun Choi; Mi Sun Chung; Hyun Jung Koo; Ji Eun Park; Hee Mang Yoon; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Cancers Screening in an Asymptomatic Population by Using Multiple Tumour Markers.

Authors:  Hsin-Yao Wang; Chia-Hsun Hsieh; Chiao-Ni Wen; Ying-Hao Wen; Chun-Hsien Chen; Jang-Jih Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient.

Authors:  Heidi Lindroth; Lisa Bratzke; Suzanne Purvis; Roger Brown; Mark Coburn; Marko Mrkobrada; Matthew T V Chan; Daniel H J Davis; Pratik Pandharipande; Cynthia M Carlsson; Robert D Sanders
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Exploring the survival prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma based on the cancer genome atlas database using artificial neural network.

Authors:  Na Jiang; Xianrong Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Decision Support Systems in Prostate Cancer Treatment: An Overview.

Authors:  Y van Wijk; I Halilaj; E van Limbergen; S Walsh; L Lutgens; P Lambin; B G L Vanneste
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Application of three statistical models for predicting the risk of diabetes.

Authors:  Siyu Liu; Yue Gao; Yuhang Shen; Min Zhang; Jingjing Li; Pinghui Sun
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.763

8.  A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.

Authors:  Hesham Salem; Daniele Soria; Jonathan N Lund; Amir Awwad
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Using machine-learned bayesian belief networks to predict perioperative risk of clostridium difficile infection following colon surgery.

Authors:  Scott Steele; Anton Bilchik; John Eberhardt; Philip Kalina; Aviram Nissan; Eric Johnson; Itzhak Avital; Alexander Stojadinovic
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2012-09-19

10.  Vesicular stomatitis forecasting based on Google Trends.

Authors:  JianYing Wang; Tong Zhang; Yi Lu; GuangYa Zhou; Qin Chen; Bing Niu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.