PURPOSE: To analyze different control-system limitations on the measured dose distributions in low-dose regions of simplified intensity fields with an electronic portal imaging device to ascertain the optimal settings for the control-system limitations in the planning system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors created one field with an "optimal fluence" of intensity 1.0 (full dose) and one field with intensity 0.0 (no dose) in the central part of the field. The influence of different dose rates (DRs) and maximum leaf speeds (LS) on the calculated and measured dose and dose profiles were analyzed. RESULTS: Good agreement between calculated and measured dose in the case of a field of intensity 1.0 was found. For the field with intensity 0.0, the measured dose was 20-60% lower than the dose calculated by the "actual fluence". The results were found dependent on the DR and LS. CONCLUSION: The overestimation in regions of optimal intensity 0.0 by the planning system cannot be resolved by the user. Taking the measured dose in the region of desired intensity 1.0 and other technical limitations (like beam hold interrupts or spikes in the cross and longitudinal profiles) into consideration, the application of an LS of 2.5 cm/s and a DR of 500 MU/min is recommended in order to minimize radiation dose applied to organs at risk, which are located in regions of low intensity, like, for example, the spinal cord.
PURPOSE: To analyze different control-system limitations on the measured dose distributions in low-dose regions of simplified intensity fields with an electronic portal imaging device to ascertain the optimal settings for the control-system limitations in the planning system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors created one field with an "optimal fluence" of intensity 1.0 (full dose) and one field with intensity 0.0 (no dose) in the central part of the field. The influence of different dose rates (DRs) and maximum leaf speeds (LS) on the calculated and measured dose and dose profiles were analyzed. RESULTS: Good agreement between calculated and measured dose in the case of a field of intensity 1.0 was found. For the field with intensity 0.0, the measured dose was 20-60% lower than the dose calculated by the "actual fluence". The results were found dependent on the DR and LS. CONCLUSION: The overestimation in regions of optimal intensity 0.0 by the planning system cannot be resolved by the user. Taking the measured dose in the region of desired intensity 1.0 and other technical limitations (like beam hold interrupts or spikes in the cross and longitudinal profiles) into consideration, the application of an LS of 2.5 cm/s and a DR of 500 MU/min is recommended in order to minimize radiation dose applied to organs at risk, which are located in regions of low intensity, like, for example, the spinal cord.
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Jaroslav Siluschek; Bernd Gagel; Marc D Piroth; Cengiz Demirel; Branka Asadpour; Michael J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.621