Literature DB >> 17926971

Leaf transmission reduction using moving jaws for dynamic MLC IMRT.

D Schmidhalter1, M K Fix, P Niederer, R Mini, P Manser.   

Abstract

The aim of this work is to investigate to what extent it is possible to use the secondary collimator jaws to reduce the transmitted radiation through the multileaf collimator (MLC) during an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). A method is developed and introduced where the jaws follow the open window of the MLC dynamically (dJAW method). With the aid of three academic cases (Closed MLC, Sliding-gap, and Chair) and two clinical cases (prostate and head and neck) the feasibility of the dJAW method and the influence of this method on the applied dose distributions are investigated. For this purpose the treatment planning system Eclipse and the Research-Toolbox were used as well as measurements within a solid water phantom were performed. The transmitted radiation through the closed MLC leads to an inhomogeneous dose distribution. In this case, the measured dose within a plane perpendicular to the central axis differs up to 40% (referring to the maximum dose within this plane) for 6 and 15 MV. The calculated dose with Eclipse is clearly more homogeneous. For the Sliding-gap case this difference is still up to 9%. Among other things, these differences depend on the depth of the measurement within the solid water phantom and on the application method. In the Chair case, the dose in regions where no dose is desired is locally reduced by up to 50% using the dJAW method instead of the conventional method. The dose inside the chair-shaped region decreased up to 4% if the same number of monitor units (MU) as for the conventional method was applied. The undesired dose in the volume body minus the planning target volume in the clinical cases prostate and head and neck decreased up to 1.8% and 1.5%, while the number of the applied MU increased up to 3.1% and 2.8%, respectively. The new dJAW method has the potential to enhance the optimization of the conventional IMRT to a further step.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17926971     DOI: 10.1118/1.2768864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Overestimation of low-dose radiation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique.

Authors:  Hilke Vorwerk; Daniela Wagner; Björn Seitz; Hans Christiansen; Hendrik A Wolff; Clemens F Hess
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Single arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy is sufficient for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with dual arc VMAT and dynamic MLC and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zhong-Hua Ning; Jin-Ming Mu; Jian-Xue Jin; Xiao-Dong Li; Qi-Lin Li; Wen-Dong Gu; Jin Huang; Yang Han; Hong-Lei Pei
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Dosimetric comparison between jaw tracking and static jaw techniques in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zhongsu Feng; Hao Wu; Yibao Zhang; Yunjun Zhang; Jinsheng Cheng; Xu Su
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Dosimetric effects of jaw tracking in step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sarah Joy; George Starkschall; Stephen Kry; Mohammed Salehpour; R Allen White; Steven H Lin; Peter Balter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dosimetric Effect of Jaw Tracking in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy.

Authors:  Sangutid Thongsawad; Chirasak Khamfongkhruea; Chirapha Tannanonta
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

6.  Assessment of potential jaw-tracking advantage using control point sequences of VMAT planning.

Authors:  Jung-in Kim; Jong Min Park; So-Yeon Park; Chang Heon Choi; Hong-Gyun Wu; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Influence of jaw tracking in intensity-modulated and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy for head and neck cancers: a dosimetric study.

Authors:  Karthick Raj Mani; Sagar Upadhayay; K J Maria Das
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2017-03-31

8.  Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chengqiang Li; Jinhu Chen; Jian Zhu; Guanzhong Gong; Cheng Tao; Zhenjiang Li; Jie Lu; Yong Yin
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique.

Authors:  Hilke Vorwerk; Daniela Wagner; Clemens F Hess
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  A comparative study of identical VMAT plans with and without jaw tracking technique.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Fan Jiang; Haizhen Yue; Qiaoqiao Hu; Jian Zhang; Zhuolun Liu; Jian Gong; Sha Li; Jianhao Geng; Yibao Zhang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.