Literature DB >> 20008457

Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

J Roman Arguello1, Yue Zhang, Tomoyuki Kado, Chuanzhu Fan, Ruoping Zhao, Hideki Innan, Wen Wang, Manyuan Long.   

Abstract

A central goal of evolutionary genetics is an understanding of the forces responsible for the observed variation, both within and between species. Theoretical and empirical work have demonstrated that genetic recombination contributes to this variation by breaking down linkage between nucleotide sites, thus allowing them to behave independently and for selective forces to act efficiently on them. The Drosophila fourth chromosome, which is believed to experience no-or very low-rates of recombination has been an important model for investigating these effects. Despite previous efforts, central questions regarding the extent of recombination and the predominant modes of selection acting on it remain open. In order to more comprehensively test hypotheses regarding recombination and its potential influence on selection along the fourth chromosome, we have resequenced regions from most of its genes from Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. yakuba. These data, along with available outgroup sequence, demonstrate that recombination is low but significantly greater than zero for the three species. Despite there being recombination, there is strong evidence that its frequency is low enough to have rendered selection relatively inefficient. The signatures of relaxed constraint can be detected at both the level of polymorphism and divergence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20008457      PMCID: PMC2877538          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  81 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach.

Authors:  Sascha Glinka; Lino Ometto; Sylvain Mousset; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection.

Authors:  A J Berry; J W Ajioka; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Kevin R Thornton; Brian Charlesworth; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Joint estimation of gene conversion rates and mean conversion tract lengths from population SNP data.

Authors:  Junming Yin; Michael I Jordan; Yun S Song
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  37 in total

1.  Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Megan Woolfit; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution of a distinct genomic domain in Drosophila: comparative analysis of the dot chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis.

Authors:  Wilson Leung; Christopher D Shaffer; Taylor Cordonnier; Jeannette Wong; Michelle S Itano; Elizabeth E Slawson Tempel; Elmer Kellmann; David Michael Desruisseau; Carolyn Cain; Robert Carrasquillo; Tien M Chusak; Katazyna Falkowska; Kelli D Grim; Rui Guan; Jacquelyn Honeybourne; Sana Khan; Louis Lo; Rebecca McGaha; Jevon Plunkett; Justin M Richner; Ryan Richt; Leah Sabin; Anita Shah; Anushree Sharma; Sonal Singhal; Fine Song; Christopher Swope; Craig B Wilen; Jeremy Buhler; Elaine R Mardis; Sarah C R Elgin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Recombination rate variation in closely related species.

Authors:  C S Smukowski; M A F Noor
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  How closely does genetic diversity in finite populations conform to predictions of neutral theory? Large deficits in regions of low recombination.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 5.  Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Rapid evolutionary rewiring of a structurally constrained eye enhancer.

Authors:  Christina I Swanson; David B Schwimmer; Scott Barolo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Positive and purifying selection on the Drosophila Y chromosome.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Leonardo B Koerich; Antonio Bernardo Carvalho; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Recent selection on the Y-to-dot translocation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Amanda M Larracuente; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Conservation and purifying selection of transcribed genes located in a rice centromere.

Authors:  Chuanzhu Fan; Jason G Walling; Jianwei Zhang; Cory D Hirsch; Jiming Jiang; Rod A Wing
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  The Evolutionary Tempo of Sex Chromosome Degradation in Carica papaya.

Authors:  Meng Wu; Richard C Moore
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.