Literature DB >> 21673743

Recombination rate variation in closely related species.

C S Smukowski1, M A F Noor.   

Abstract

Despite their importance to successful meiosis and various evolutionary processes, meiotic recombination rates sometimes vary within species or between closely related species. For example, humans and chimpanzees share virtually no recombination hotspot locations in the surveyed portion of the genomes. However, conservation of recombination rates between closely related species has also been documented, raising an apparent contradiction. Here, we evaluate how and why conflicting patterns of recombination rate conservation and divergence may be observed, with particular emphasis on features that affect recombination, and the scale and method with which recombination is surveyed. Additionally, we review recent studies identifying features influencing fine-scale and broad-scale recombination patterns and informing how quickly recombination rates evolve, how changes in recombination impact selection and evolution in natural populations, and more broadly, which forces influence genome evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21673743      PMCID: PMC3242630          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  135 in total

1.  Selection for recombination in small populations.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Chromosome choreography: the meiotic ballet.

Authors:  Scott L Page; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand-break repair.

Authors:  J N Strathern; B K Shafer; C B McGill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Meiotic recombination hotspots.

Authors:  M Lichten; A S Goldman
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 5.  Population genetic perspectives on the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  M W Feldman; S P Otto; F B Christiansen
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Recombination has little effect on the rate of sequence divergence in pseudoautosomal boundary 1 among humans and great apes.

Authors:  Soojin Yi; Tyrone J Summers; Nathaniel M Pearson; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Absence of the TAP2 human recombination hotspot in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Susan E Ptak; Amy D Roeder; Matthew Stephens; Yoav Gilad; Svante Pääbo; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The impact of recombination on nucleotide substitutions in the human genome.

Authors:  Laurent Duret; Peter F Arndt
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  80 in total

1.  Sympatric speciation revealed by genome-wide divergence in the blind mole rat Spalax.

Authors:  Kexin Li; Wei Hong; Hengwu Jiao; Guo-Dong Wang; Karl A Rodriguez; Rochelle Buffenstein; Yang Zhao; Eviatar Nevo; Huabin Zhao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Pádraic Corcoran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Juxtaposition of heterozygous and homozygous regions causes reciprocal crossover remodelling via interference during Arabidopsis meiosis.

Authors:  Piotr A Ziolkowski; Luke E Berchowitz; Christophe Lambing; Nataliya E Yelina; Xiaohui Zhao; Krystyna A Kelly; Kyuha Choi; Liliana Ziolkowska; Viviana June; Eugenio Sanchez-Moran; Chris Franklin; Gregory P Copenhaver; Ian R Henderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Recombination correlates with synaptonemal complex length and chromatin loop size in bovids-insights into mammalian meiotic chromosomal organization.

Authors:  Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Miluse Vozdova; Jonathan Fernández; Hana Sebestova; Laia Capilla; Jan Frohlich; Covadonga Vara; Adrià Hernández-Marsal; Jaroslav Sipek; Terence J Robinson; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The evolution of recombination rates in finite populations during ecological speciation.

Authors:  James Reeve; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Jan Engelstädter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The Genomic Architecture of a Rapid Island Radiation: Recombination Rate Variation, Chromosome Structure, and Genome Assembly of the Hawaiian Cricket Laupala.

Authors:  Thomas Blankers; Kevin P Oh; Aureliano Bombarely; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Substantial Heritable Variation in Recombination Rate on Multiple Scales in Honeybees and Bumblebees.

Authors:  Takeshi Kawakami; Andreas Wallberg; Anna Olsson; Dimitry Wintermantel; Joachim R de Miranda; Mike Allsopp; Maj Rundlöf; Matthew T Webster
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Background Selection Does Not Mimic the Patterns of Genetic Diversity Produced by Selective Sweeps.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution.

Authors:  Amy L Dapper; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.