Literature DB >> 17028331

Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda.

Doris Bachtrog1, Peter Andolfatto.   

Abstract

Selection, recombination, and the demographic history of a species can all have profound effects on genomewide patterns of variability. To assess the impact of these forces in the genome of Drosophila miranda, we examine polymorphism and divergence patterns at 62 loci scattered across the genome. In accordance with recent findings in D. melanogaster, we find that noncoding DNA generally evolves more slowly than synonymous sites, that the distribution of polymorphism frequencies in noncoding DNA is significantly skewed toward rare variants relative to synonymous sites, and that long introns evolve significantly slower than short introns or synonymous sites. These observations suggest that most noncoding DNA is functionally constrained and evolving under purifying selection. However, in contrast to findings in the D. melanogaster species group, we find little evidence of adaptive evolution acting on either coding or noncoding sequences in D. miranda. Levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in D. miranda are comparable to those observed in D. melanogaster, but vary considerably among chromosomes. These patterns suggest a significantly lower rate of recombination on autosomes, possibly due to the presence of polymorphic autosomal inversions and/or differences in chromosome sizes. All chromosomes show significant departures from the standard neutral model, including too much heterogeneity in synonymous site polymorphism relative to divergence among loci and a general excess of rare synonymous polymorphisms. These departures from neutral equilibrium expectations are discussed in the context of nonequilibrium models of demography and selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028331      PMCID: PMC1698658          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.062760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  83 in total

Review 1.  Inversion polymorphisms and nucleotide variability in Drosophila.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; F Depaulis; A Navarro
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Contrasting patterns of molecular evolution of the genes on the new and old sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  S Yi; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  J C Fay; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  DNA evolution under weak selection.

Authors:  H Tachida
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-12-30       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  The role of population size in molecular evolution.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  D J Begun; P Whitley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  P Andolfatto
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Molecular population genetics of X-linked genes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  M Kovacevic; S W Schaeffer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; M Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M D Adams; S E Celniker; R A Holt; C A Evans; J D Gocayne; P G Amanatides; S E Scherer; P W Li; R A Hoskins; R F Galle; R A George; S E Lewis; S Richards; M Ashburner; S N Henderson; G G Sutton; J R Wortman; M D Yandell; Q Zhang; L X Chen; R C Brandon; Y H Rogers; R G Blazej; M Champe; B D Pfeiffer; K H Wan; C Doyle; E G Baxter; G Helt; C R Nelson; G L Gabor; J F Abril; A Agbayani; H J An; C Andrews-Pfannkoch; D Baldwin; R M Ballew; A Basu; J Baxendale; L Bayraktaroglu; E M Beasley; K Y Beeson; P V Benos; B P Berman; D Bhandari; S Bolshakov; D Borkova; M R Botchan; J Bouck; P Brokstein; P Brottier; K C Burtis; D A Busam; H Butler; E Cadieu; A Center; I Chandra; J M Cherry; S Cawley; C Dahlke; L B Davenport; P Davies; B de Pablos; A Delcher; Z Deng; A D Mays; I Dew; S M Dietz; K Dodson; L E Doup; M Downes; S Dugan-Rocha; B C Dunkov; P Dunn; K J Durbin; C C Evangelista; C Ferraz; S Ferriera; W Fleischmann; C Fosler; A E Gabrielian; N S Garg; W M Gelbart; K Glasser; A Glodek; F Gong; J H Gorrell; Z Gu; P Guan; M Harris; N L Harris; D Harvey; T J Heiman; J R Hernandez; J Houck; D Hostin; K A Houston; T J Howland; M H Wei; C Ibegwam; M Jalali; F Kalush; G H Karpen; Z Ke; J A Kennison; K A Ketchum; B E Kimmel; C D Kodira; C Kraft; S Kravitz; D Kulp; Z Lai; P Lasko; Y Lei; A A Levitsky; J Li; Z Li; Y Liang; X Lin; X Liu; B Mattei; T C McIntosh; M P McLeod; D McPherson; G Merkulov; N V Milshina; C Mobarry; J Morris; A Moshrefi; S M Mount; M Moy; B Murphy; L Murphy; D M Muzny; D L Nelson; D R Nelson; K A Nelson; K Nixon; D R Nusskern; J M Pacleb; M Palazzolo; G S Pittman; S Pan; J Pollard; V Puri; M G Reese; K Reinert; K Remington; R D Saunders; F Scheeler; H Shen; B C Shue; I Sidén-Kiamos; M Simpson; M P Skupski; T Smith; E Spier; A C Spradling; M Stapleton; R Strong; E Sun; R Svirskas; C Tector; R Turner; E Venter; A H Wang; X Wang; Z Y Wang; D A Wassarman; G M Weinstock; J Weissenbach; S M Williams; K C Worley; D Wu; S Yang; Q A Yao; J Ye; R F Yeh; J S Zaveri; M Zhan; G Zhang; Q Zhao; L Zheng; X H Zheng; F N Zhong; W Zhong; X Zhou; S Zhu; X Zhu; H O Smith; R A Gibbs; E W Myers; G M Rubin; J C Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  41 in total

1.  Natural selection shapes nucleotide polymorphism across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Evolution of amino-acid sequences and codon usage on the Drosophila miranda neo-sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Muller's ratchet and the degeneration of the Drosophila miranda neo-Y chromosome.

Authors:  Vera B Kaiser; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Adaptive Evolution Patterns in the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas.

Authors:  Kai Song; Shiyong Wen; Guofan Zhang
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Positive selection at the binding sites of the male-specific lethal complex involved in dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Reduced selection for codon usage bias in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.