Literature DB >> 21737276

Rapid evolutionary rewiring of a structurally constrained eye enhancer.

Christina I Swanson1, David B Schwimmer, Scott Barolo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhancers are genomic cis-regulatory sequences that integrate spatiotemporal signals to control gene expression. Enhancer activity depends on the combination of bound transcription factors as well as-in some cases-the arrangement and spacing of binding sites for these factors. Here, we examine evolutionary changes to the sequence and structure of sparkling, a Notch/EGFR/Runx-regulated enhancer that activates the dPax2 gene in cone cells of the developing Drosophila eye.
RESULTS: Despite functional and structural constraints on its sequence, sparkling has undergone major reorganization in its recent evolutionary history. Our data suggest that the relative strengths of the various regulatory inputs into sparkling change rapidly over evolutionary time, such that reduced input from some factors is compensated by increased input from different regulators. These gains and losses are at least partly responsible for the changes in enhancer structure that we observe. Furthermore, stereotypical spatial relationships between certain binding sites ("grammar elements") can be identified in all sparkling orthologs-although the sites themselves are often recently derived. We also find that low binding affinity for the Notch-regulated transcription factor Su(H), a conserved property of sparkling, is required to prevent ectopic responses to Notch in noncone cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Rapid DNA sequence turnover does not imply either the absence of critical cis-regulatory information or the absence of structural rules. Our findings demonstrate that even a severely constrained cis-regulatory sequence can be significantly rewired over a short evolutionary timescale.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21737276      PMCID: PMC3143281          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  70 in total

1.  Combinatorial signaling in the specification of primary pigment cells in the Drosophila eye.

Authors:  Raghavendra Nagaraj; Utpal Banerjee
Journal:  Development       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  A rationale for the enhanceosome and other evolutionarily constrained enhancers.

Authors:  Dmitri Papatsenko; Mike Levine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Evolutionary genetics: how flies get naked.

Authors:  Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Conserved expression without conserved regulatory sequence: the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Authors:  Matthew T Weirauch; Timothy R Hughes
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 5.  Enhancers: the abundance and function of regulatory sequences beyond promoters.

Authors:  Michael Bulger; Mark Groudine
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Structural rules and complex regulatory circuitry constrain expression of a Notch- and EGFR-regulated eye enhancer.

Authors:  Christina I Swanson; Nicole C Evans; Scott Barolo
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Precise temporal control of the eye regulatory gene Pax6 via enhancer-binding site affinity.

Authors:  Sheldon Rowan; Trevor Siggers; Salil A Lachke; Yingzi Yue; Martha L Bulyk; Richard L Maas
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Five-vertebrate ChIP-seq reveals the evolutionary dynamics of transcription factor binding.

Authors:  Dominic Schmidt; Michael D Wilson; Benoit Ballester; Petra C Schwalie; Gordon D Brown; Aileen Marshall; Claudia Kutter; Stephen Watt; Celia P Martinez-Jimenez; Sarah Mackay; Iannis Talianidis; Paul Flicek; Duncan T Odom
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Evolutionary mirages: selection on binding site composition creates the illusion of conserved grammars in Drosophila enhancers.

Authors:  Richard W Lusk; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence.

Authors:  Patricia J Wittkopp; Gizem Kalay
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Molecular and evolutionary processes generating variation in gene expression.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Pétra Vande Zande; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Developmental effector gene regulation: Multiplexed strategies for functional analysis.

Authors:  Lijun Wang; Kari Koppitch; Ann Cutting; Ping Dong; Parul Kudtarkar; Jenny Zeng; R Andrew Cameron; Eric H Davidson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Low-affinity transcription factor binding sites shape morphogen responses and enhancer evolution.

Authors:  Andrea I Ramos; Scott Barolo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Ancestral resurrection of the Drosophila S2E enhancer reveals accessible evolutionary paths through compensatory change.

Authors:  Carlos Martinez; Joshua S Rest; Ah-Ram Kim; Michael Ludwig; Martin Kreitman; Kevin White; John Reinitz
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Rainbow Enhancers Regulate Restrictive Transcription in Teleost Green, Red, and Blue Cones.

Authors:  Wei Fang; Chuanyu Guo; Xiangyun Wei
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Suboptimization of developmental enhancers.

Authors:  Emma K Farley; Katrina M Olson; Wei Zhang; Alexander J Brandt; Daniel S Rokhsar; Michael S Levine
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome.

Authors:  Matthew Slattery; Tianyin Zhou; Lin Yang; Ana Carolina Dantas Machado; Raluca Gordân; Remo Rohs
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 13.807

9.  Syntax compensates for poor binding sites to encode tissue specificity of developmental enhancers.

Authors:  Emma K Farley; Katrina M Olson; Wei Zhang; Daniel S Rokhsar; Michael S Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  How to tune an enhancer.

Authors:  Scott Barolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.