Literature DB >> 20006663

An analysis of licking microstructure in three strains of mice.

A W Johnson1, A Sherwood, D R Smith, M Wosiski-Kuhn, M Gallagher, P C Holland.   

Abstract

Mouse models of feeding provide a useful tool for elucidating the molecular pathways of energy regulation. The majority of studies in mice have been limited to intake analyses conducted over extended periods of time, which fail to distinguish between a variety of factors that influence nutrient intake. Using licking microstructure analyses we examined both the size and number of licking bursts for water, polycose, sucrose and lecithin in three strains of mice (C57BL/6J, 129Sv/ImJ and C57129F1 hybrids), using pause criteria (250-500, >500 and >1000 ms) that have previously been described in the rat. Burst size and number varied both as a function of tastant concentration and mouse strain; however, these differences were most evident with the >1000 ms pause criterion. Consistent with previous reports, during water consumption C57 mice showed longer mean interlick intervals, a larger number of bursts but reduced burst size relative to the two other strains. F1 mice showed larger burst sizes for polycose, while C57 mice displayed a greater number of bursts for both polycose and sucrose. Both 129 and F1 mice were insensitive to sucrose concentration, whereas C57 mice showed attenuated lecithin intake influenced by a reduction in the size of bursts for this tastant. These results suggest that these strains of mice display differences in the pattern of licking that are most evident with the use of larger pause criteria. These differences in licking behavior might reflect influences of genetic background on pre- and post-ingestive factors controlling intake, the reinforcing properties of each tastant, or native differences in licking style. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006663      PMCID: PMC3219432          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  34 in total

1.  Intracerebroventricular CART peptide reduces rat ingestive behavior and alters licking microstructure.

Authors:  S Aja; G J Schwartz; M J Kuhar; T H Moran
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Receptors for bitter and sweet taste.

Authors:  Jean Pierre Montmayeur; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Promoter characterization of the mouse melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1.

Authors:  Bernard Lakaye; Antoine Adamantidis; Bernard Coumans; Thierry Grisar
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2004-04-16

4.  Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions.

Authors:  J D Davis; G P Smith
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Coding the sweet taste in the nucleus of the solitary tract: differential roles for anterior tongue and nasoincisor duct gustatory receptors in the rat.

Authors:  S P Travers; R Norgren
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Correlation between choline acetyltransferase activity and learning ability in different mice strains and their offspring.

Authors:  P Mandel; G Ayad; J C Hermetet; A Ebel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-05-31       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Genetic and environmental variability in lick rates of mice.

Authors:  G P Horowitz; F K Stephan; J C Smith; G Whitney
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1977-10

8.  Brain acetylcholine: control by dietary choline.

Authors:  E L Cohen; R J Wurtman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste.

Authors:  Grace Q Zhao; Yifeng Zhang; Mark A Hoon; Jayaram Chandrashekar; Isolde Erlenbach; Nicholas J P Ryba; Charles S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The taste reactivity test. I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats.

Authors:  H J Grill; R Norgren
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-03-24       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  18 in total

1.  Greater effort boosts the affective taste properties of food.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic control of oromotor phenotypes: A survey of licking and ingestive behaviors in highly diverse strains of mice.

Authors:  Steven J St John; Lu Lu; Robert W Williams; Jennifer Saputra; John D Boughter
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-04-12

3.  Assessing Reality Testing in Mice Through Dopamine-Dependent Associatively Evoked Processing of Absent Gustatory Stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin R Fry; Nicollette Russell; Ryan Gifford; Cindee F Robles; Claire E Manning; Akira Sawa; Minae Niwa; Alexander W Johnson
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  The role of opioid processes in reward and decision-making.

Authors:  Vincent Laurent; Ashleigh K Morse; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Temporal signatures of taste quality driven by active sensing.

Authors:  Dustin M Graham; Chengsan Sun; David L Hill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Rachel L Poole; Tiffany R Aleman; Hillary T Ellis; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 7.  Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.457

8.  Ethanol drinking microstructure of a high drinking in the dark selected mouse line.

Authors:  Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Examining the influence of CS duration and US density on cue-potentiated feeding through analyses of licking microstructure.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2018-02

10.  Decreased consumption of sweet fluids in μ opioid receptor knockout mice: a microstructural analysis of licking behavior.

Authors:  Sean B Ostlund; Alisa Kosheleff; Nigel T Maidment; Niall P Murphy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.