Literature DB >> 23568577

Decreased consumption of sweet fluids in μ opioid receptor knockout mice: a microstructural analysis of licking behavior.

Sean B Ostlund1, Alisa Kosheleff, Nigel T Maidment, Niall P Murphy.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Evidence suggests that the palatability of food (i.e., the hedonic impact produced by its sensory features) can promote feeding and may underlie compulsive eating, leading to obesity. Pharmacological studies implicate opioid transmission in the hedonic control of feeding, though these studies often rely on agents lacking specificity for particular opioid receptors.
OBJECTIVES: Here, we investigated the role of mu opioid receptors (MORs) specifically in determining hedonic responses to palatable sweet stimuli.
METHODS: In Experiment 1, licking microstructure when consuming sucrose solution (2 to 20 %) was compared in MOR knockout and wildtype mice as a function of sucrose concentration and level of food deprivation. In Experiment 2, a similar examination was conducted using the palatable but calorie-free stimulus sucralose (0.001 to 1 %), allowing study of licking behavior independent of homeostatic variables.
RESULTS: In Experiment 1, MOR knockout mice exhibited several alterations in sucrose licking. Although wildtype mice exhibited a twofold increase in the burst length when food deprived, relative to the nondeprived test, this aspect of sucrose licking was generally insensitive to manipulations of food deprivation for MOR knockout mice. Furthermore, during concentration testing, their rate of sucrose licking was less than half that of wildtype mice. During sucralose testing (Experiment 2), MOR knockout mice licked at approximately half the wildtype rate, providing more direct evidence that MOR knockout mice were impaired in processing stimulus palatability.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that transmission through MORs mediates hedonic responses to palatable stimuli, and therefore likely contributes to normal and pathological eating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23568577      PMCID: PMC3742650          DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3077-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  50 in total

1.  Central opioid receptor subtype antagonists differentially alter sucrose and deprivation-induced water intake in rats.

Authors:  I W Beczkowska; W D Bowen; R J Bodnar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1992-09-04       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Intake of high-fat food is selectively enhanced by mu opioid receptor stimulation within the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  M Zhang; B A Gosnell; A E Kelley
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene.

Authors:  H W Matthes; R Maldonado; F Simonin; O Valverde; S Slowe; I Kitchen; K Befort; A Dierich; M Le Meur; P Dollé; E Tzavara; J Hanoune; B P Roques; B L Kieffer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Morphine enhances selection of both sucrose and ethanol in a two-bottle test.

Authors:  M F Stromberg; S Meister; J R Volpicelli; R R Ulm
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.405

5.  Opiate agonists microinjected into the nucleus accumbens enhance sucrose drinking in rats.

Authors:  M Zhang; A E Kelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  General, mu and kappa opioid antagonists in the nucleus accumbens alter food intake under deprivation, glucoprivic and palatable conditions.

Authors:  R J Bodnar; M J Glass; A Ragnauth; M L Cooper
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1995-11-27       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Naloxone effects on sucrose-motivated behavior.

Authors:  J Cleary; D T Weldon; E O'Hare; C Billington; A S Levine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Evidence for early opioid modulation of licking responses to sucrose and intralipid: a microstructural analysis in the rat.

Authors:  S Higgs; S J Cooper
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Naloxone blocks that portion of feeding driven by sweet taste in food-restricted rats.

Authors:  A S Levine; D T Weldon; M Grace; J P Cleary; C J Billington
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-01

10.  Selective actions of central mu and kappa opioid antagonists upon sucrose intake in sham-fed rats.

Authors:  L Leventhal; T C Kirkham; J L Cole; R J Bodnar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1995-07-10       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  17 in total

1.  Parsing the hedonic and motivational influences of nociceptin on feeding using licking microstructure analysis in mice.

Authors:  Ian A Mendez; Nigel T Maidment; Niall P Murphy
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Genetic control of oromotor phenotypes: A survey of licking and ingestive behaviors in highly diverse strains of mice.

Authors:  Steven J St John; Lu Lu; Robert W Williams; Jennifer Saputra; John D Boughter
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-04-12

Review 3.  The role of opioid processes in reward and decision-making.

Authors:  Vincent Laurent; Ashleigh K Morse; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.457

Review 5.  Feeding-modulatory effects of mu-opioids in the medial prefrontal cortex: a review of recent findings and comparison to opioid actions in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Ryan A Selleck; Brian A Baldo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Involvement of Endogenous Enkephalins and β-Endorphin in Feeding and Diet-Induced Obesity.

Authors:  Ian A Mendez; Sean B Ostlund; Nigel T Maidment; Niall P Murphy
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 7.  Recent studies of the effects of sugars on brain systems involved in energy balance and reward: Relevance to low calorie sweeteners.

Authors:  Susan Murray; Alastair Tulloch; Kristen Criscitelli; Nicole M Avena
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-04-09

8.  Modulation of appetitive motivation by prefrontal cortical mu-opioid receptors is dependent upon local dopamine D1 receptor signaling.

Authors:  Ryan A Selleck; Juliana Giacomini; Brandon D Buchholtz; Curtis Lake; Ken Sadeghian; Brian A Baldo
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Responses to drugs of abuse and non-drug rewards in leptin deficient ob/ob mice.

Authors:  Matthew J Muelbl; Natalie N Nawarawong; Patrick T Clancy; Catherine E Nettesheim; Yi Wei Lim; Christopher M Olsen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Pattern of access determines influence of junk food diet on cue sensitivity and palatability.

Authors:  Alisa R Kosheleff; Jingwen Araki; Jennifer Hsueh; Andrew Le; Kevin Quizon; Sean B Ostlund; Nigel T Maidment; Niall P Murphy
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.