Literature DB >> 21047860

Greater effort boosts the affective taste properties of food.

Alexander W Johnson1, Michela Gallagher.   

Abstract

Actions can create preferences, increasing the value ascribed to commodities acquired at greater cost. This behavioural finding has been observed in a variety of species; however, the causal factors underlying the phenomenon are relatively unknown. We sought to develop a behavioural platform to examine the relationship between effort and reinforcer value in mice trained under demanding or lenient schedules of reinforcement to obtain food. In the initial experiment, expenditure of effort enhanced the value of the associated food via relatively lasting changes in its hedonic attributes, promoting an acquired preference for these reinforcers when tested outside of the training environment. Moreover, otherwise neutral cues associated with those reinforcers during training similarly acquired greater reinforcing value, as assessed under conditioned reinforcement. In a separate experiment, expenditure of effort was also capable of enhancing the value of less-preferred low-caloric reinforcers. Analysis of licking microstructure revealed the basis for this increased valuation was, in part, due to increased palatability of the associated reinforcer. This change in the hedonic taste properties of the food can not only serve as a basis for preference, but also guide decision-making and foraging behaviour by coordinating a potentially adaptive repertoire of incentive motivation, goal-directed action and consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047860      PMCID: PMC3081738          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  "Work ethic" in pigeons: reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward.

Authors:  T S Clement; J R Feltus; D H Kaiser; T R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  John Davis and the meanings of licking.

Authors:  G P Smith
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Pigeons shift their preference toward locations of food that take more effort to obtain.

Authors:  Andrea M Friedrich; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 4.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Endocannabinoid hedonic hotspot for sensory pleasure: anandamide in nucleus accumbens shell enhances 'liking' of a sweet reward.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Kyle S Smith; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  An analysis of licking microstructure in three strains of mice.

Authors:  A W Johnson; A Sherwood; D R Smith; M Wosiski-Kuhn; M Gallagher; P C Holland
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Palatability and foraging cost interact to control caloric intake.

Authors:  K Ackroff; A Sclafani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-01

8.  Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Preference for rewards that follow greater effort and greater delay.

Authors:  Jérôme Alessandri; Jean-Claude Darcheville; Yvonne Delevoye-Turrell; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  A C Spector; P A Klumpp; J M Kaplan
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  22 in total

1.  Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Meagan K Gregory; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Melissa J Allman; Arthur E Wilke; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  Rewarding behavior with a sweet food strengthens its valuation.

Authors:  Jan M Bauer; Marina Schröder; Martina Vecchi; Tina Bake; Suzanne L Dickson; Michèle Belot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effort increases sensitivity to reward and loss magnitude in the human brain.

Authors:  Julen Hernandez Lallement; Katarina Kuss; Peter Trautner; Bernd Weber; Armin Falk; Klaus Fliessbach
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Effects of lesions of the amygdala central nucleus on autoshaped lever pressing.

Authors:  Stephen E Chang; Daniel S Wheeler; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Contingency Enhances Sensitivity to Loss in a Gambling Task with Diminishing Returns.

Authors:  Jonathan R Miller; Iser G DeLeon; Lisa M Toole; Gregory A Lieving; Melissa J Allman
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2016-02-24

6.  Preference for the Outcome That Follows a Relatively Aversive Event: Contrast or Delay Reduction?

Authors:  Rebecca A Singer; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2011-08-01

7.  Roles of nucleus accumbens and basolateral amygdala in autoshaped lever pressing.

Authors:  Stephen E Chang; Daniel S Wheeler; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 8.  Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.457

9.  Effort and valuation in the brain: the effects of anticipation and execution.

Authors:  Irma T Kurniawan; Marc Guitart-Masip; Peter Dayan; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Lipopolysaccharide reduces incentive motivation while boosting preference for high reward in mice.

Authors:  Elisabeth G Vichaya; Sarah C Hunt; Robert Dantzer
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.