Literature DB >> 30082927

Examining the influence of CS duration and US density on cue-potentiated feeding through analyses of licking microstructure.

Alexander W Johnson1.   

Abstract

In the current study, groups of mice were trained with either short (20 s) or long (120 s) conditioned stimulus (CS) durations associated with different rates of sucrose unconditioned stimulus (US) delivery, to examine whether different behavioral forms of cue-potentiated feeding in sated mice would be evoked. In training mice received presentations of an auditory CS for 20 s during which a sucrose US was delivered at a density of 1/9 s (Group-20-s). A second group of mice received an auditory CS for 120 s and a US density of 1/49 s (Group-120-s). During training, a shorter CS duration and higher rate of US delivery resulted in greater acquisition of food cup responding, and during the test stage Group-20-s mice also displayed higher CS evoked lick rates, though all mice showed cue-potentiated feeding. An analysis of licking microstructure also revealed that Group-120-s mice displayed CS evoked licking behavior that reflected an increase in the perceived palatability of the sucrose US. These findings are discussed with respect to the influence of CS interval and US density on associatively activated sensory and affective representations of a US, and contrast mediated effects resulting from presentation of excitatory and inhibitory conditioned stimuli.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30082927      PMCID: PMC6075650          DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2017.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Motiv        ISSN: 0023-9690


  54 in total

1.  Increase in intake with sham feeding experience is concentration dependent.

Authors:  J D Davis; G P Smith; B Singh; D P McCann
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-08

2.  Lesions of orbitofrontal cortex impair rats' differential outcome expectancy learning but not conditioned stimulus-potentiated feeding.

Authors:  Michael A McDannald; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher; Peter C Holland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dopamine on D2-like receptors "reboosts" dopamine D1-like receptor-mediated behavioural activation in rats licking for sucrose.

Authors:  Paolo S D'Aquila
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: I. Variations in the initial value of the conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Joe Arthurs; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Food deprivation- and palatability-induced microstructural changes in ingestive behavior.

Authors:  J D Davis; M C Perez
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-01

6.  Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-01

7.  Tests for inhibition after extinction of a conditioned stimulus in the flavour aversion procedure.

Authors:  L Aguado; I de Brugada; G Hall; L Agate
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-08

8.  Formation of excitatory and inhibitory associations between absent events.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Andrew Sherwood
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-07

9.  Discriminated lateralized eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit: an experimental context for separating specific and general associative influences.

Authors:  S E Brandon; S L Betts; A R Wagner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-07

10.  Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  A C Spector; P A Klumpp; J M Kaplan
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  2 in total

1.  Daily memantine treatment blunts hedonic response to sucrose in rats.

Authors:  Adriana Galistu; Paolo S D'Aquila
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Memantine effects on ingestion microstructure and the effect of administration time: A within-subject study.

Authors:  Adriana Galistu; Paolo S D'Aquila
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.