OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous valve replacements are presently being evaluated in clinical trials. As delivery of the valve is catheter based, the safety and efficacy of these procedures may be influenced by the imaging used. To assist the surgeon and improve the success of the operation, we have performed transapical aortic valve replacements using real-time magnetic resonance imaging guidance. METHODS: Twenty-eight swine underwent aortic valve replacement by real-time magnetic resonance imaging on the beating heart. Stentless bioprostheses mounted on balloon-expandable stents were used. Magnetic resonance imaging (1.5 T) was used to identify the critical anatomic landmarks. In addition to anatomic confirmation of adequate placement of the prosthesis, functional assessment of the valve and left ventricle and perfusion were also obtained with magnetic resonance imaging. A series of short-term feasibility experiments were conducted (n = 18) in which the animals were humanely killed after valve placement and assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. Ten additional animals were allowed to survive and had follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans and confirmatory echocardiography at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Real-time magnetic resonance imaging provided superior visualization of the landmarks needed. The time to implantation after apical access was 74 +/- 18 seconds. Perfusion scanning demonstrated adequate coronary flow and functional imaging documented preservation of ventricular contractility in all animals after successful deployment. Phase contrast imaging revealed minimal intravalvular or paravalvular leaks. Longer term results demonstrated stability of the implants with preservation of myocardial perfusion and function over time. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time magnetic resonance imaging provides excellent visualization for intraoperative guidance of aortic valve replacement on the beating heart. Additionally, it allows assessment of tissue perfusion and organ function that is not obtainable by conventional imaging alone. 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous valve replacements are presently being evaluated in clinical trials. As delivery of the valve is catheter based, the safety and efficacy of these procedures may be influenced by the imaging used. To assist the surgeon and improve the success of the operation, we have performed transapical aortic valve replacements using real-time magnetic resonance imaging guidance. METHODS: Twenty-eight swine underwent aortic valve replacement by real-time magnetic resonance imaging on the beating heart. Stentless bioprostheses mounted on balloon-expandable stents were used. Magnetic resonance imaging (1.5 T) was used to identify the critical anatomic landmarks. In addition to anatomic confirmation of adequate placement of the prosthesis, functional assessment of the valve and left ventricle and perfusion were also obtained with magnetic resonance imaging. A series of short-term feasibility experiments were conducted (n = 18) in which the animals were humanely killed after valve placement and assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. Ten additional animals were allowed to survive and had follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans and confirmatory echocardiography at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Real-time magnetic resonance imaging provided superior visualization of the landmarks needed. The time to implantation after apical access was 74 +/- 18 seconds. Perfusion scanning demonstrated adequate coronary flow and functional imaging documented preservation of ventricular contractility in all animals after successful deployment. Phase contrast imaging revealed minimal intravalvular or paravalvular leaks. Longer term results demonstrated stability of the implants with preservation of myocardial perfusion and function over time. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time magnetic resonance imaging provides excellent visualization for intraoperative guidance of aortic valve replacement on the beating heart. Additionally, it allows assessment of tissue perfusion and organ function that is not obtainable by conventional imaging alone. 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Elliot R McVeigh; Michael A Guttman; Robert J Lederman; Ming Li; Ozgur Kocaturk; Timothy Hunt; Shawn Kozlov; Keith A Horvath Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Thomas Walther; Volkmar Falk; Jörg Kempfert; Michael A Borger; Jens Fassl; Michael W A Chu; Gerhard Schuler; Friedrich W Mohr Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Alec Vahanian; Ottavio Alfieri; Nawwar Al-Attar; Manuel Antunes; Jeroen Bax; Bertrand Cormier; Alain Cribier; Peter De Jaegere; Gerard Fournial; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Jan Kovac; Susanne Ludgate; Francesco Maisano; Neil Moat; Friedrich Mohr; Patrick Nataf; Luc Piérard; José Luis Pomar; Joachim Schofer; Pilar Tornos; Murat Tuzcu; Ben van Hout; Ludwig K Von Segesser; Thomas Walther Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2008-05-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Samuel V Lichtenstein; Anson Cheung; Jian Ye; Christopher R Thompson; Ronald G Carere; Sanjeevan Pasupati; John G Webb Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joshua L Chan; Dumitru Mazilu; Justin G Miller; Timothy Hunt; Keith A Horvath; Ming Li Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Philipp Kahlert; Nina Parohl; Juliane Albert; Lena Schäfer; Renate Reinhardt; Gernot M Kaiser; Ian McDougall; Brad Decker; Björn Plicht; Raimund Erbel; Holger Eggebrecht; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Keith A Horvath; Dumitru Mazilu; Junfeng Cai; Bogdan Kindzelski; Ming Li Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 5.209