Keith A Horvath1, Dumitru Mazilu, Ozgur Kocaturk, Ming Li. 1. Cardiothoracic Surgery Research Program, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. horvathka@mail.nih.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Aortic valves have been implanted on self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) stents minimally invasively. We have demonstrated the advantages of transapical aortic valve implantation (tAVI) under real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) guidance. Whether there are different advantages to SE or BE stents is unknown. We report rtMRI-guided tAVI in a porcine model using both SE and BE stents, and compare the differences between the stents. METHODS: A total of 22 Yucatan pigs (45-57 kg) underwent tAVI. Commercially available stentless bioprostheses (21-25 mm) were mounted on either BE platinum-iridium stents or SE-nitinol stents. rtMRI guidance was employed as the intraoperative imaging. Markers on both types of stents were used to enhance visualization in rtMRI. Pigs were allowed to survive and had follow-up MRI scans and echocardiography at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: rtMRI provided excellent visualization of the aortic valve implantation mounted on both stent types. The implantation times were shorter with the SE stents (60 ± 14s) than with the BE stents (74 ± 18s), (p=0.027). The total procedure time was 31 and 37 min, respectively (p=0.12). It was considerably easier to manipulate the SE stent during deployment, without hemodynamic compromise. This was not always the case with the BE stent, and its placement occasionally resulted in coronary obstruction and death. Long-term results demonstrated stability of the implants with preservation of myocardial perfusion and function over time for both stents. CONCLUSIONS: SE stents were easier to position and deploy, thus leading to fewer complications during tAVI. Future optimization of SE stent design should improve clinical results.
OBJECTIVE: Aortic valves have been implanted on self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) stents minimally invasively. We have demonstrated the advantages of transapical aortic valve implantation (tAVI) under real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) guidance. Whether there are different advantages to SE or BE stents is unknown. We report rtMRI-guided tAVI in a porcine model using both SE and BE stents, and compare the differences between the stents. METHODS: A total of 22 Yucatan pigs (45-57 kg) underwent tAVI. Commercially available stentless bioprostheses (21-25 mm) were mounted on either BEplatinum-iridium stents or SE-nitinol stents. rtMRI guidance was employed as the intraoperative imaging. Markers on both types of stents were used to enhance visualization in rtMRI. Pigs were allowed to survive and had follow-up MRI scans and echocardiography at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: rtMRI provided excellent visualization of the aortic valve implantation mounted on both stent types. The implantation times were shorter with the SE stents (60 ± 14s) than with the BE stents (74 ± 18s), (p=0.027). The total procedure time was 31 and 37 min, respectively (p=0.12). It was considerably easier to manipulate the SE stent during deployment, without hemodynamic compromise. This was not always the case with the BE stent, and its placement occasionally resulted in coronary obstruction and death. Long-term results demonstrated stability of the implants with preservation of myocardial perfusion and function over time for both stents. CONCLUSIONS:SE stents were easier to position and deploy, thus leading to fewer complications during tAVI. Future optimization of SE stent design should improve clinical results.
Authors: Titus Kuehne; Sevim Yilmaz; Carolin Meinus; Phillip Moore; Maythem Saeed; Oliver Weber; Charles B Higgins; Thiemo Blank; Erhard Elsaesser; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Peter Ewert; Peter E Lange; Eike Nagel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-12-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Elliot R McVeigh; Michael A Guttman; Robert J Lederman; Ming Li; Ozgur Kocaturk; Timothy Hunt; Shawn Kozlov; Keith A Horvath Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Samuel V Lichtenstein; Anson Cheung; Jian Ye; Christopher R Thompson; Ronald G Carere; Sanjeevan Pasupati; John G Webb Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Georg Lutter; Daniela Kuklinski; Georg Berg; Patrick Von Samson; Juergen Martin; Michael Handke; Peter Uhrmeister; Friedhelm Beyersdorf Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Lars G Svensson; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Eric E Roselli; Alan Stewart; Matt Williams; William N Anderson; David Brown; Marty Leon; Bruce Lytle; Jeffrey Moses; Michael Mack; Murat Tuzcu; Craig Smith Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Joshua L Chan; Dumitru Mazilu; Justin G Miller; Timothy Hunt; Keith A Horvath; Ming Li Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Philipp Kahlert; Nina Parohl; Juliane Albert; Lena Schäfer; Renate Reinhardt; Gernot M Kaiser; Ian McDougall; Brad Decker; Björn Plicht; Raimund Erbel; Holger Eggebrecht; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Keith A Horvath; Dumitru Mazilu; Junfeng Cai; Bogdan Kindzelski; Ming Li Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Sophie C Rier; Suzan Vreemann; Wouter H Nijhof; Vincent J H M van Driel; Ivo A C van der Bilt Journal: Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2022 Jan-Dec