Justin G Miller1, Ming Li1, Dumitru Mazilu1, Tim Hunt1, Keith A Horvath2. 1. Cardiothoracic Surgery Research Program, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. 2. Cardiothoracic Surgery Research Program, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. Electronic address: horvathka@mail.nih.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI)-guided transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) offers improved visualization, real-time imaging, and pinpoint accuracy with device delivery. Unfortunately, performing a TAVR in a MRI scanner can be a difficult task owing to limited space and an awkward working environment. Our solution was to design a MRI-compatible robot-assisted device to insert and deploy a self-expanding valve from a remote computer console. We present our preliminary results in a swine model. METHODS: We used an MRI-compatible robotic arm and developed a valve delivery module. A 12-mm trocar was inserted in the apex of the heart via a subxiphoid incision. The delivery device and nitinol stented prosthesis were mounted on the robot. Two continuous real-time imaging planes provided a virtual real-time 3-dimensional reconstruction. The valve was deployed remotely by the surgeon via a graphic user interface. RESULTS: In this acute nonsurvival study, 8 swine underwent robot-assisted rtMRI TAVR for evaluation of feasibility. Device deployment took a mean of 61 ± 5 seconds. Postdeployment necropsy was performed to confirm correlations between imaging and actual valve positions. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the feasibility of robotic-assisted TAVR using rtMRI guidance. This approach may eliminate some of the challenges of performing a procedure while working inside of an MRI scanner, and may improve the success of TAVR. It provides superior visualization during the insertion process, pinpoint accuracy of deployment, and, potentially, communication between the imaging device and the robotic module to prevent incorrect or misaligned deployment.
BACKGROUND: Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI)-guided transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) offers improved visualization, real-time imaging, and pinpoint accuracy with device delivery. Unfortunately, performing a TAVR in a MRI scanner can be a difficult task owing to limited space and an awkward working environment. Our solution was to design a MRI-compatible robot-assisted device to insert and deploy a self-expanding valve from a remote computer console. We present our preliminary results in a swine model. METHODS: We used an MRI-compatible robotic arm and developed a valve delivery module. A 12-mm trocar was inserted in the apex of the heart via a subxiphoid incision. The delivery device and nitinol stented prosthesis were mounted on the robot. Two continuous real-time imaging planes provided a virtual real-time 3-dimensional reconstruction. The valve was deployed remotely by the surgeon via a graphic user interface. RESULTS: In this acute nonsurvival study, 8 swine underwent robot-assisted rtMRI TAVR for evaluation of feasibility. Device deployment took a mean of 61 ± 5 seconds. Postdeployment necropsy was performed to confirm correlations between imaging and actual valve positions. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the feasibility of robotic-assisted TAVR using rtMRI guidance. This approach may eliminate some of the challenges of performing a procedure while working inside of an MRI scanner, and may improve the success of TAVR. It provides superior visualization during the insertion process, pinpoint accuracy of deployment, and, potentially, communication between the imaging device and the robotic module to prevent incorrect or misaligned deployment.
Authors: Elliot R McVeigh; Michael A Guttman; Robert J Lederman; Ming Li; Ozgur Kocaturk; Timothy Hunt; Shawn Kozlov; Keith A Horvath Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Keith A Horvath; Dumitru Mazilu; Junfeng Cai; Bogdan Kindzelski; Ming Li Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Michael A Quail; Johannes Nordmeyer; Silvia Schievano; Markus Reinthaler; Michael J Mullen; Andrew M Taylor Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Sophie C Rier; Suzan Vreemann; Wouter H Nijhof; Vincent J H M van Driel; Ivo A C van der Bilt Journal: Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2022 Jan-Dec
Authors: Gert Klug; Sebastian Reinstadler; Felix Troger; Magdalena Holzknecht; Martin Reindl; Christina Tiller; Ivan Lechner; Priscilla Fink; Mathias Pamminger; Christian Kremser; Hanno Ulmer; Axel Bauer; Bernhard Metzler; Agnes Mayr Journal: Trials Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 2.728