Literature DB >> 19967536

Comparison of spinal anatomy between 3-Tesla MRI and CT-myelography under healthy and pathological conditions.

Astrid Ellen Grams1, Jens Gempt, Annette Förschler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In many centres both MRI and CT-myelography are performed for treatment planning of degenerative spine disease. More and more centres acquire 3-Tesla MRI scanners in which some artefacts, which lead to difficulties in image evaluation, are more pronounced than at 1.5 Tesla. Aim of this study was to compare spinal physiological and pathological anatomy between 3-Tesla MRI and CT-myelography and to review current imaging standards.
METHODS: In 47 spinal segments commonly used 3-Tesla T2-weighted sequences and CT-myelography studies were evaluated retrospectively. Spinal canal, neural foraminal, spinal cord and disc protrusion diameters were measured.
RESULTS: The spinal canal was found to be 10% tighter with the utilized MRI sequences, in comparison to CT-M and foraminal diameters were found to be 19.7% tighter in MRI. This was more pronounced in narrowed than in healthy segments. Spinal cord size and size of disc protrusions displayed no significant difference between MRI and CT-myelography.
CONCLUSIONS: The main advantage of CT-myelography, in comparison to 3-Tesla MRI, is the reliable information about the bony structures. Soft tissues like the spinal cord or disc protrusions were visualised equivalently with both modalities concerning diameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19967536     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-009-0601-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  14 in total

1.  3T MR for clinical use: update.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fukatsu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Comparison of the multiecho data image combination sequence with magnetization transfer saturation pulse versus lumbar myelography/postmyelographic computed tomography.

Authors:  U Dorenbeck; A G Schreyer; I Q Grunwald; P Held; S Feuerbach; J Seitz
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Imaging in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Joseph D Fortin; Michael T Wheeler
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study.

Authors:  Gerwin P Schmidt; Bernd Wintersperger; Anno Graser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Far lateral lumbar disc herniations and associated structural abnormalities. An evaluation in 60 patients of the comparative value of CT, MRI, and myelo-CT in diagnosis and management.

Authors:  N E Epstein; J A Epstein; R Carras; R A Hyman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Traumatic lumbosacral nerve root meningoceles. The value of myelography, CT and MRI in the assessment of nerve root continuity.

Authors:  K L Verstraete; F Martens; P Smeets; T Vandekerckhove; D Meire; P M Parizel; E Van de Velde; L Calliauw
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  The neuroradiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus: II. A comparison of computed tomography (CT), myelography, CT-myelography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R P Jackson; J E Cain; R R Jacobs; B R Cooper; G E McManus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography.

Authors:  J Reul; B Gievers; J Weis; A Thron
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Cervical myelopathy: a comparison of magnetic resonance and myelography.

Authors:  T J Masaryk; M T Modic; M A Geisinger; J Standefer; R W Hardy; F Boumphrey; P M Duchesneau
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Postfusion magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by a titanium, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and carbon intervertebral disc spacer.

Authors:  Thorsten Ernstberger; Gabert Heidrich
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2007-04
View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of wideband steady-state free precession and T₂-weighted fast spin echo in spine disorder assessment at 1.5 and 3 T.

Authors:  Giovanna S Danagoulian; Lei Qin; Krishna S Nayak; Rivka R Colen; Srinivasan Mukundan; Mitchell B Harris; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; William A Copen; Ehud J Schmidt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.

Authors:  James Meacock; Moritz Schramm; Senthil Selvanathan; Stuart Currie; Deborah Stocken; David Jayne; Simon Thomson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Comparative study of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging and myelography in young soldiers with herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  Suk-Hyung Kang; Seung Hong Choi; Nak Jong Seong; Jung Min Ko; Eun-Suk Cho; Kwang Pil Ko
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-12-31

4.  Management of radicular pain in rheumatic disease: insight for the physician.

Authors:  Ade Adebajo; John Fabule
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  Risk factors for spinal cord injury progression after anterior fusion for cervical spine trauma: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Ichiro Okano; Yuki Midorikawa; Natsuki Midorikawa; Yushi Hoshino; Takatoshi Sawada; Tomoaki Toyone; Katsunori Inagaki
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2018-10-05

6.  Myelography in the Age of MRI: Why We Do It, and How We Do It.

Authors:  Christoph Ozdoba; Jan Gralla; Alexander Rieke; Ralph Binggeli; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-03-06

7.  A method for quantitative measurement of lumbar intervertebral disc structures: an intra- and inter-rater agreement and reliability study.

Authors:  Andreas Tunset; Per Kjaer; Shadi Samir Chreiteh; Tue Secher Jensen
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2013-08-16

Review 8.  Imaging in Spine Surgery: Current Concepts and Future Directions.

Authors:  Garrett K Harada; Zakariah K Siyaji; Sadaf Younis; Philip K Louie; Dino Samartzis; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-11-01

9.  Comparison of Root Images between Post-Myelographic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Chun-Kun Park; Hong-Jae Lee; Kyeong-Sik Ryu
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-08-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.