Literature DB >> 21430976

Comparative study of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging and myelography in young soldiers with herniated lumbar disc.

Suk-Hyung Kang1, Seung Hong Choi, Nak Jong Seong, Jung Min Ko, Eun-Suk Cho, Kwang Pil Ko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the diagnostic performances of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MR myelography (MRM) and myelography in young soldiers with a herniated lumbar disc (HLD).
METHODS: Sixty-five male soldiers with HLD comprised the study cohort. A visual analogue scale for low back pain (VAS-LBP), VAS for leg radiating pain (VAS-LP), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were applied. Lumbar MR, MRM, and myelographic findings were checked and evaluated by four independent radiologists, respectively. Each radiologist was asked to score (1 to 5) the degree of disc protrusion and nerve root compression using modified grading systems devised by the North American Spine Society and Pfirrmann and the physical examination rules for conscription in the Republic of Korea. Correlated coefficients between clinical and radiological factors were calculated. Interpretational reproducibility between MRI and myelography by four bases were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 20.5 ± 1.1. Mean VAS-LBP and VAS-LP were 6.7 ± 1.6 and 7.4 ± 1.7, respectively. Mean ODI was 48.0 ± 16.2%. Mean MRI, MRM, and myelography scores were 3.3 ± 0.9, 3.5 ± 1.0, and 3.9 ± 1.1, respectively. All scores of diagnostic performances were significantly correlated (p < 0.05). However, none of these scores reflected the severity of patients' symptoms. There was no statistical difference of interpretational reproducibility between MRI and myelography.
CONCLUSION: Although MRI and myelography are based on different principles, they produce similar interpretational reproducibility in young soldiers with a HLD. However, these modalities do not reflect the severity of symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparison study; Herniated Lumbar Disc; Interpretational reproducibility; MR Myelography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Myelography

Year:  2010        PMID: 21430976      PMCID: PMC3053544          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.6.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  20 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Yoichi Aota; Tetsu Niwa; Kohki Yoshikawa; Atsushi Fujiwara; Toshio Asada; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  MR-myelography: a comparison with conventional myelography.

Authors:  K Hergan; T Amann; H Vonbank; C Hefel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Advances in imaging of vertebral and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andrew L Goldberg; Sharif M Kershah
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects : a seven-year follow-up study.

Authors:  D G Borenstein; J W O'Mara; S D Boden; W C Lauerman; A Jacobson; C Platenberg; D Schellinger; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Role of imaging in spine, hand, and wrist osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Antoine Feydy; Etienne Pluot; Henri Guerini; Jean-Luc Drapé
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.670

6.  Modified Pfirrmann grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Yi-Xiang J Wang; Gregory E Antonio; Kai Chow Choi; Alfred Yu; Anil T Ahuja; Ping Chung Leung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Imaging the degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  David Malfair; Douglas P Beall
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 8.  Biological treatment for degenerative disc disease: implications for the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Yejia Zhang; Howard S An; Chadi Tannoury; Eugene J-M A Thonar; Mitchell K Freedman; D Greg Anderson
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Clinical usefulness of CT-myelogram comparing with the MRI in degenerative cervical spinal disorders: is CTM still useful for primary diagnostic tool?

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Byung-Wan Choi; Gyu-Hyung Kim; Jung-Ryul Kim
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-07

10.  The value of routine MR myelography at MRI of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M J O'Connell; M Ryan; T Powell; S Eustace
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  4 in total

1.  Factors Associated With Longer Postoperative Outpatient Follow-up Duration in Patients With Single Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Noncomplicated Patient Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yunsuk Her; Suk-Hyung Kang; Yong-Jun Cho; Jin Seo Yang; Jin Pyeong Jeon; Hyuk Jai Choi
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2018-08-29

2.  A Prospective Observational Study of Return to Work after Single Level Lumbar Discectomy.

Authors:  Suk-Hyung Kang; Jin Seo Yang; Steve Sungwon Cho; Yong-Jun Cho; Jin Pyeong Jeon; Hyuk Jai Choi
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2020-11-01

3.  Usefulness of Three Dimensional Proset MR Images for Diagnosis of Symptomatic L5-S1 Foraminal and Extraforaminal Stenosis.

Authors:  Sang Woo Kim; Chang Hwan Kim; Min Su Kim; Young Jin Jung; Woo Mok Byun
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-07-31

4.  Comparison of Root Images between Post-Myelographic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Chun-Kun Park; Hong-Jae Lee; Kyeong-Sik Ryu
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-08-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.