Literature DB >> 33392737

Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.

James Meacock1, Moritz Schramm2, Senthil Selvanathan2, Stuart Currie3, Deborah Stocken4, David Jayne5, Simon Thomson2.   

Abstract

The study design of this paper is systematic review. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the existing radiological grading systems that are used to assess cervical foraminal stenosis. The importance of imaging the cervical spine using CT or MRI in evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis is widely accepted; however, there is no consensus for standardized methodology to assess the compression of the cervical nerve roots. A systematic search of Ovid Medline databases, Embase 1947 to present, Cinahl, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ISRCTN and WHO international clinical trials was performed for reports of cervical foraminal stenosis published before 01 February 2020. In collaboration with the University of Leeds, a search strategy was developed. A total of 6952 articles were identified with 59 included. Most of the reports involved multiple imaging modalities with standard axial and sagittal imaging used most. The grading themes that came from this systematic review show that the most mature for cervical foraminal stenosis is described by (Kim et al. Korean J Radiol 16:1294, 2015) and (Park et al. Br J Radiol 86:20120515, 2013). Imaging of the cervical nerve root canals is mostly performed using MRI and is reported using subjective terminology. The Park, Kim and Modified Kim systems for classifying the degree of stenosis of the nerve root canal have been described. Clinical application of these scoring systems is limited by their reliance on nonstandard imaging (Park), limited validation against clinical symptoms and surgical outcome data. Oblique fine cut images derived from three dimensional MRI datasets may yield more consistency, better clinical correlation, enhanced surgical decision-making and outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grading; Neurosurgery; Radiculopathy; Radiology; Systematic review and spine

Year:  2021        PMID: 33392737     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02596-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  40 in total

1.  Oblique reformation in cervical spine computed tomography: a new look at an old friend.

Authors:  Catherine C Roberts; N Troy McDaniel; Elizabeth A Krupinski; William K Erly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Feasibility of Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in Cervical Foraminal Stenosis: Prediction of Surgical Outcomes by the Foraminal Shape on Preoperative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Bon Sub Gu; Jin Hoon Park; Han Yu Seong; Sang Ku Jung; Sung Woo Roh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Comparison of spinal anatomy between 3-Tesla MRI and CT-myelography under healthy and pathological conditions.

Authors:  Astrid Ellen Grams; Jens Gempt; Annette Förschler
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Cervical radiculopathy: a review.

Authors:  John M Caridi; Matthias Pumberger; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-09

5.  Interreader Reliability and Clinical Validity of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading System for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis.

Authors:  Jung Eun Lee; Hee Jin Park; So Yeon Lee; Yong Taek Lee; Yong Bum Kim; Kyu Hong Lee; Hyunchul Shin; Young Joon Kwon
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  The comparison of multiple F-wave variable studies and magnetic resonance imaging examinations in the assessment of cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Chu-Hsu Lin; Yuan-Hsiung Tsai; Chia-Hao Chang; Chien-Min Chen; Hung-Chih Hsu; Chun-Yen Wu; Chang-Zern Hong
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Management of unilateral cervical radiculopathy in the military: the cost effectiveness of posterior cervical foraminotomy compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Luis M Tumialán; Ryan P Ponton; Wayne M Gluf
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Clinical relevance of neuroforaminal patency after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Christopher Brenke; Martin Dostal; Anne Carolus; Christel Weiß; Ernst Wilhelm Radü; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating (ACDFP) Versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (PCF) for Patients With Single-level Cervical Radiculopathy at 1-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Matthew D Alvin; Daniel Lubelski; Kalil G Abdullah; Robert G Whitmore; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.876

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the study of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; José Pablo Martínez Barbero; Jade García Espinosa; Alberto Martínez Martínez
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.