Literature DB >> 16210818

3T MR for clinical use: update.

Hiroshi Fukatsu1.   

Abstract

Clinical experience with 3-tesla MRI for body applications has only a short history; to date, it has no proven practical advantage over 1.5-tesla or less powerful systems. However, the theoretical advantage of higher field strength-which includes a higher signal-to-noise ratio with identical scan parameters, higher special resolution available within clinically acceptable scan time, and better spectral resolution-can contribute to the clinical outcome. This paper seeks to demonstrate some of the clinical advantages of the 3-tesla system through preliminary experiences as well as the potential advantages of a 3-tesla system when combined with much of the hardware and software that is clinically accepted in the 1.5-tesla world.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 16210818     DOI: 10.2463/mrms.2.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci        ISSN: 1347-3182            Impact factor:   2.471


  11 in total

1.  Development of identification of the central sulcus in brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Norio Hayashi; Keita Sakuta; Kaori Minehiro; Masako Takanaga; Shigeru Sanada; Masayuki Suzuki; Tosiaki Miyati; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-09-29

2.  High resolution myocardial magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging at 3 T using a 1 M contrast agent.

Authors:  Bernhard D Klumpp; Achim Seeger; Christina Doesch; Joerg Doering; Tobias Hoevelborn; Ulrich Kramer; Michael Fenchel; Meinrad P Gawaz; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of spinal anatomy between 3-Tesla MRI and CT-myelography under healthy and pathological conditions.

Authors:  Astrid Ellen Grams; Jens Gempt; Annette Förschler
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  [3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging in children and adults with congenital heart disease].

Authors:  I Voges; M Jerosch-Herold; M Helle; C Hart; H-H Kramer; C Rickers
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Comparison of gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced and diffusion-weighted liver MRI for detection of small hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Kotaro Shimada; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Yuusuke Hirokawa; Shigeki Arizono; Toshiya Shibata; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Renal ablation using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology assessment.

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Roland Krug; Loi Do; Steven W Hetts; Mark W Wilson
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 7.  MRI of the kidney-state of the art.

Authors:  J J Nikken; G P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Pelvic belt effects on pelvic morphometry, muscle activity and body balance in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Authors:  Odette Soisson; Juliane Lube; Andresa Germano; Karl-Heinz Hammer; Christoph Josten; Freddy Sichting; Dirk Winkler; Thomas L Milani; Niels Hammer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Bohyun Kim; Eun Sun Lee; Hyoung Jung Kim; Ji Hye Min; Jeong Min Lee; Moon Hyung Choi; Nieun Seo; Sang Hyun Choi; Seong Hyun Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Yang Shin Park; Yong Eun Chung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  MR Imaging in the 21st Century: Technical Innovation over the First Two Decades.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kabasawa
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.760

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.