Literature DB >> 22287191

Comparison of wideband steady-state free precession and T₂-weighted fast spin echo in spine disorder assessment at 1.5 and 3 T.

Giovanna S Danagoulian1, Lei Qin, Krishna S Nayak, Rivka R Colen, Srinivasan Mukundan, Mitchell B Harris, Ferenc A Jolesz, Ajit Shankaranarayanan, William A Copen, Ehud J Schmidt.   

Abstract

Wideband steady-state free precession (WB-SSFP) is a modification of balanced steady-state free precession utilizing alternating repetition times to reduce susceptibility-induced balanced steady-state free precession limitations, allowing its use for high-resolution myelographic-contrast spinal imaging. Intertissue contrast and spatial resolution of complete-spine-coverage 3D WB-SSFP were compared with those of 2D T₂-weighted fast spin echo, currently the standard for spine T₂-imaging. Six normal subjects were imaged at 1.5 and 3 T. The signal-to-noise ratio efficiency (SNR per unit-time and unit-volume) of several tissues was measured, along with four intertissue contrast-to-noise ratios; nerve-ganglia:fat, intradural-nerves:cerebrospinal fluid, nerve-ganglia:muscle, and muscle:fat. Patients with degenerative and traumatic spine disorders were imaged at both MRI fields to demonstrate WB-SSFP clinical advantages and disadvantages. At 3 T, WB-SSFP provided spinal contrast-to-noise ratios 3.7-5.2 times that of fast spin echo. At 1.5 T, WB-SSFP contrast-to-noise ratio was 3-3.5 times that of fast spin echo, excluding a 1.7 ratio for intradural-nerves:cerebrospinal fluid. WB-SSFP signal-to-noise ratio efficiency was also higher. Three-dimensional WB-SSFP disadvantages relative to 2D fast spin echo are reduced edema hyperintensity, reduced muscle signal, and higher motion sensitivity. WB-SSFP's high resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio improved visualization of intradural nerve bundles, foraminal nerve roots, and extradural nerve bundles, improving detection of nerve compression in radiculopathy and spinal-stenosis. WB-SSFP's high resolution permitted reformatting into orthogonal planes, providing distinct advantages in gauging fine spine pathology.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22287191      PMCID: PMC3712341          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  23 in total

1.  Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain.

Authors:  J P Mugler; S Bao; R V Mulkern; C R Guttmann; R L Robertson; F A Jolesz; J R Brookeman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Flow effects in balanced steady state free precession imaging.

Authors:  M Markl; M T Alley; C J Elkins; N J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Michael Schär; Sebastian Kozerke; Stefan E Fischer; Peter Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT.

Authors:  U Dorenbeck; A G Schreyer; J Schlaier; P Held; S Feuerbach; J Seitz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T.

Authors:  Greg J Stanisz; Ewa E Odrobina; Joseph Pun; Michael Escaravage; Simon J Graham; Michael J Bronskill; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Effect of diffusion in inhomogeneous magnetic fields on balanced steady-state free precession.

Authors:  O Bieri; K Scheffler
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  On the origin of apparent low tissue signals in balanced SSFP.

Authors:  O Bieri; K Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Wideband SSFP: alternating repetition time balanced steady state free precession with increased band spacing.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Hsu-Lei Lee; Brian A Hargreaves; Bob S Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Steady-state free precession imaging in the presence of motion: application for improved visualization of the cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  E M Haacke; P A Wielopolski; J A Tkach; M T Modic
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Cutting-edge imaging of the spine.

Authors:  A Talia Vertinsky; Michael V Krasnokutsky; Michael Augustin; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the dependence of CEST-EPI measurement on repetition time, RF irradiation duty cycle and imaging flip angle for enhanced pH sensitivity.

Authors:  Phillip Zhe Sun; Jie Lu; Yin Wu; Gang Xiao; Renhua Wu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Three-Dimensional Sequence for Lumbar Nerve Root with Intervertebral Foramen.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takashima; Tsuneo Takebayashi; Hiroki Shishido; Mitsunori Yoshimoto; Rui Imamura; Yoshihiro Akatsuka; Yoshinori Terashima; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Masateru Nagae; Toshikazu Kubo; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.