Literature DB >> 2005685

The clinical implications of brushite calculi.

L W Klee1, C G Brito, J E Lingeman.   

Abstract

The clinical history of 30 patients with a total of 46 proved brushite urinary calculi was reviewed. The patients were active metabolically with 87% having a history of multiple calculi. Of the brushite stones 61% appeared hyperdense on x-ray but they had no consistent shape. Of the patients who were metabolically evaluated 82% had treatable abnormalities. Treatment with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy or ureteroscopy and ureteral lithotripsy was 92% successful in rendering the patient stone-free, whereas, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy resulted in a stone-free rate of only 11%. Brushite stone patients require aggressive treatment, full metabolic evaluation and close clinical followup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2005685     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38432-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Differentiating calcium oxalate and hydroxyapatite stones in vivo using dual-energy CT and urine supersaturation and pH values.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Mingliang Qu; Rickey E Carter; Shuai Leng; Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo; Giselle Jaramillo; Amy E Krambeck; John C Lieske; Terri J Vrtiska; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Kidney stone disease.

Authors:  Fredric L Coe; Andrew Evan; Elaine Worcester
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Brushite stone disease as a consequence of lithotripsy?

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Shelly E Handa; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-10

4.  Fragility of brushite stones in shock wave lithotripsy: absence of correlation with computerized tomography visible structure.

Authors:  James C Williams; Tariq Hameed; Molly E Jackson; Syed Aftab; Alessia Gambaro; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.

Authors:  H E Elmansy; J E Lingeman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 6.  Management of complex renal calculi.

Authors:  S A Holmes; H N Whitfield
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Recurrence rates of urinary calculi according to stone composition and morphology.

Authors:  Michel Daudon; Paul Jungers; Dominique Bazin; James C Williams
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Urine pH in renal calcium stone formers who do and do not increase stone phosphate content with time.

Authors:  Joan H Parks; Fredric L Coe; Andrew P Evan; Elaine M Worcester
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 9.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Physiopathology and etiology of stone formation in the kidney and the urinary tract.

Authors:  Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.