Literature DB >> 23927200

Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter.

Daniel E Fovargue1, Sorin Mitran, Nathan B Smith, Georgy N Sankin, Walter N Simmons, Pei Zhong.   

Abstract

A multiphysics computational model of the focusing of an acoustic pulse and subsequent shock wave formation that occurs during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is presented. In the electromagnetic lithotripter modeled in this work the focusing is achieved via a polystyrene acoustic lens. The transition of the acoustic pulse through the solid lens is modeled by the linear elasticity equations and the subsequent shock wave formation in water is modeled by the Euler equations with a Tait equation of state. Both sets of equations are solved simultaneously in subsets of a single computational domain within the BEARCLAW framework which uses a finite-volume Riemann solver approach. This model is first validated against experimental measurements with a standard (or original) lens design. The model is then used to successfully predict the effects of a lens modification in the form of an annular ring cut. A second model which includes a kidney stone simulant in the domain is also presented. Within the stone the linear elasticity equations incorporate a simple damage model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927200      PMCID: PMC3745489          DOI: 10.1121/1.4812881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Robin O Cleveland; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Javier Van Cauwelaert; Michael R Bailey; David A Lifshitz; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-12

3.  Treatment of kidney stones: current lithotripsy devices are proving less effective in some cases.

Authors:  Nicole L Miller; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2006-05

4.  New approaches to nonlinear diffractive field propagation.

Authors:  P T Christopher; K J Parker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modeling the Dornier HM3 lithotripter.

Authors:  T Christopher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Efficacy and safety of a new-generation shockwave lithotripsy machine in the treatment of single renal or ureteral stones: Experience with 2670 patients.

Authors:  Tulga Egilmez; Mehmet Ilteris Tekin; Murat Gonen; Ferhat Kilinc; Resit Goren; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Simulation of the effects of cavitation and anatomy in the shock path of model lithotripters.

Authors:  Jeff Krimmel; Tim Colonius; Michel Tanguay
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 8.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; W Brendel; E Schmiedt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Focusing of shock waves induced by optical breakdown in water.

Authors:  Georgy N Sankin; Yufeng Zhou; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  5 in total

1.  Shock-Induced Damage and Dynamic Fracture in Cylindrical Bodies Submerged in Liquid.

Authors:  S Cao; Y Zhang; D Liao; P Zhong; K G Wang
Journal:  Int J Solids Struct       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.900

2.  Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Nathan B Smith; Georgy Sankin; Nicholas John Kuntz; John Francis Madden; Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Michael Eric Lipkin; Walter Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Variations of stress field and stone fracture produced at different lateral locations in a shockwave lithotripter field.

Authors:  Gaoming Xiang; Xiaojian Ma; Cosima Liang; Hongyang Yu; Defei Liao; Georgy Sankin; Shunxiang Cao; Kevin Wang; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  An experimentally-calibrated damage mechanics model for stone fracture in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Daniel Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Georgy Sankin; Ying Zhang; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Int J Fract       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Effects of Stone Size on the Comminution Process and Efficiency in Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Isaac Nault; Sorin Mitran; Edwin S Iversen; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.