Literature DB >> 9334635

Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

J W Segura, G M Preminger, D G Assimos, S P Dretler, R I Kahn, J E Lingeman, J N Macaluso.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The American Urological Association convened the Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel to analyze the literature regarding available methods for treating ureteral calculi and to make practice policy recommendations based on the treatment outcomes data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel searched the MEDLINE data base for all articles related to ureteral calculi published from 1966 to January 1996. Outcomes data were extracted from articles accepted after panel review. The data were then meta-analyzed to produce outcome estimates for alternative treatments of ureteral calculi.
RESULTS: The data indicate that up to 98% of stones less than 0.5 cm. in diameter, especially in the distal ureter, will pass spontaneously. Shock wave lithotripsy is recommended as first line treatment for most patients with stones 1 cm. or less in the proximal ureter. Shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy are acceptable treatment choices for stones 1 cm. or less in the distal ureter.
CONCLUSIONS: Most ureteral stones will pass spontaneously. Those that do not can be removed by either shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy. Traditional blind basket extraction, without fluoroscopic control and guide wires, is not recommended. Open surgery is appropriate as a salvage procedure or in certain unusual circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9334635     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64173-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  130 in total

1.  Managing acute renal colic across the primary-secondary care interface: a pathway of care based on evidence and consensus.

Authors:  P J Wright; P J English; A P S Hungin; S N E Marsden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

2.  Incidental kidney stones: a single center experience with kidney donor selection.

Authors:  Irene K Kim; Jane C Tan; Jessica Lapasia; Arvand Elihu; Stephan Busque; Marc L Melcher
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 3.  Kidney stones.

Authors:  Timothy Y Tseng; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-11-10

4.  Tamsulosin does not have greater efficacy than conventional treatment for distal ureteral stone expulsion in Mexican patients.

Authors:  Raúl Ochoa-Gómez; Emilio Prieto-Díaz-Chávez; Benjamín Trujillo-Hernández; Clemente Vásquez
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-04-24

5.  [The frequency-doubled double-pulse Neodym:YAG laser lithotripter (FREDDY) in lithotripsy of urinary stones. First clinical experience].

Authors:  A Ebert; J Stangl; R Kühn; W Schafhauser
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Kidney stones.

Authors:  Malvinder S Parmar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-12

7.  Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Nikolaos Polimeros; Adamantios Kavouras; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Evaluation of the sensitivity of scout radiographs on unenhanced helical CT in identifying ureteric calculi: a large UK tertiary referral centre experience.

Authors:  W W Yap; J C Belfield; P Bhatnagar; S Kennish; T M Wah
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Mingqing Wang; Qiduo Shi; Xuguang Wang; Kun Yang; Rui Yang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-18

Review 10.  [Ureteroscopy (URS) for ureteric calculi].

Authors:  R Hofmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.