Literature DB >> 16600747

Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Amy E Krambeck1, Matthew T Gettman, Audrey L Rohlinger, Christine M Lohse, David E Patterson, Joseph W Segura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: SWL has revolutionized the management of nephrolithiasis and it is a preferred treatment for uncomplicated renal and proximal ureteral calculi. Since its introduction in 1982, conflicting reports of early adverse effects have been published. However, to our knowledge the long-term medical effects associated with SWL are unknown. We evaluated these adverse medical effects associated with SWL for renal and proximal ureteral stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chart review identified 630 patients treated with SWL at our institution in 1985. Questionnaires were sent to 578 patients who were alive in 2004. The response rate was 58.9%. Respondents were matched by age, sex and year of presentation to a cohort of patients with nephrolithiasis who were treated nonsurgically.
RESULTS: At 19 years of followup hypertension was more prevalent in the SWL group (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03, 2.10, p = 0.034). The development of hypertension was related to bilateral treatment (p = 0.033). In the SWL group diabetes mellitus developed in 16.8% of patients. Patients treated with SWL were more likely to have diabetes mellitus than controls (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.73 to 6.02, p <0.001). Multivariate analysis controlling for change in body mass index showed a persistent risk of diabetes mellitus in the SWL group (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.56 to 9.02, p = 0.003). Diabetes mellitus was related to the number of administered shocks and treatment intensity (p = 0.005 and 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: At 19 years of followup SWL for renal and proximal ureteral stones was associated with the development of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The incidence of these conditions was significantly higher than in a cohort of conservatively treated patients with nephrolithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16600747     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00989-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  78 in total

1.  Urine cytology to evaluate urinary urothelial damage of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa; Kuddusi Pancaroglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 2.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Shock wave lithotripsy is not predictive of hypertension among community stone formers at long-term followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Andrew D Rule; Xujian Li; Eric J Bergstralh; Matthew T Gettman; John C Lieske
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Management of kidney stones.

Authors:  Nicole L Miller; James E Lingeman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-03

5.  Risk of Hypertension among First-Time Symptomatic Kidney Stone Formers.

Authors:  Wonngarm Kittanamongkolchai; Kristin C Mara; Ramila A Mehta; Lisa E Vaughan; Aleksandar Denic; John J Knoedler; Felicity T Enders; John C Lieske; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

7.  A cumulative shear mechanism for tissue damage initiation in shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freund; Tim Colonius; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Treating lower pole renal stones: in defence of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  John Honey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Herbal medicines in the management of urolithiasis: alternative or complementary?

Authors:  Veronika Butterweck; Saeed R Khan
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.