Literature DB >> 19953262

Greater amount of visual feedback decreases force variability by reducing force oscillations from 0-1 and 3-7 Hz.

Harsimran S Baweja1, Deanna M Kennedy, Julie Vu, David E Vaillancourt, Evangelos A Christou.   

Abstract

The purpose was to determine the relation between visual feedback gain and variability in force and whether visual gain-induced changes in force variability were associated with frequency-specific force oscillations and changes in the neural activation of the agonist muscle. Fourteen young adults (19-29 years) were instructed to accurately match the target force at 2 and 10% of their maximal voluntary contraction with abduction of the index finger. Force was maintained at specific visual feedback gain levels that varied across trials. Each trial lasted 20 s and the amount of visual feedback was varied by changing the visual gain from 0.5 to 1,474 pixels/N (13 levels; equals approximately 0.001-4.57 degrees ). Force variability was quantified as the standard deviation of the detrended force data. The neural activation of the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) was measured with surface electromyography. The mean force did not vary significantly with the amount of visual feedback. In contrast, force variability decreased from low gains compared to moderate gains (0.5-4 pixels/N: 0.09 +/- 0.04 vs. 64-1,424 pixels/N: 0.06 +/- 0.02 N). The decrease in variability was predicted by a decrease in the power of force oscillations from 0-1 Hz (approximately 50%) and 3-7 Hz (approximately 20%). The activity of the FDI muscle did not vary across the visual feedback gains. These findings demonstrate that in young adults force variability can be decreased with increased visual feedback gain (>64 pixels/N vs. 0.5-4 pixels/N) due to a decrease in the power of oscillations in the force from 0-1 and 3-7 Hz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19953262      PMCID: PMC2863099          DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1301-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  30 in total

1.  Variability and noise in continuous force production.

Authors:  A B Slifkin; K M Newell
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Daniel M Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multi-directional strength and force envelope of the index finger.

Authors:  Zong-Ming Li; H Jamie Pfaeffle; Dean G Sotereanos; Robert J Goitz; Savio L-Y Woo
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-04

5.  Information processing limitations with aging in the visual scaling of isometric force.

Authors:  Jacob J Sosnoff; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Aging, visual intermittency, and variability in isometric force output.

Authors:  Jacob J Sosnoff; Karl M Newell
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Aging, visuomotor correction, and force fluctuations in large muscles.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Devin V Dinenno; Bjorn Jorgensen; Seth J Welsh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 8.  Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force.

Authors:  C J De Luca; Z Erim
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Effects of visual gain on force control at the elbow and ankle.

Authors:  Janey Prodoehl; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Variability of quadriceps femoris motor neuron discharge and muscle force in human aging.

Authors:  Seth J Welsh; Devin V Dinenno; Brian L Tracy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  21 in total

1.  Motor unit recruitment strategies and muscle properties determine the influence of synaptic noise on force steadiness.

Authors:  Jakob L Dideriksen; Francesco Negro; Roger M Enoka; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Processing of visual information compromises the ability of older adults to control novel fine motor tasks.

Authors:  Harsimran S Baweja; MinHyuk Kwon; Tanya Onushko; David L Wright; Daniel M Corcos; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual information gain and task asymmetry interact in bimanual force coordination and control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The optimal neural strategy for a stable motor task requires a compromise between level of muscle cocontraction and synaptic gain of afferent feedback.

Authors:  Jakob L Dideriksen; Francesco Negro; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Transient shifts in frontal and parietal circuits scale with enhanced visual feedback and changes in force variability and error.

Authors:  Cynthia Poon; Stephen A Coombes; Daniel M Corcos; Evangelos A Christou; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Force and time gain interact to nonlinearly scale adaptive visual-motor isometric force control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Age-related differences in the availability of visual feedback during bimanual pinch.

Authors:  Kazumi Critchley; Masahiro Kokubu; Motoyuki Iemitsu; Satoshi Fujita; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Bimanual coordination and the intermittency of visual information in isometric force tracking.

Authors:  Charley W Lafe; Matheus M Pacheco; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Altered visual strategies and attention are related to increased force fluctuations during a pinch grip task in older adults.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Wendy E Huddleston; Bradley E Ernest
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Greater amount of visual information exacerbates force control in older adults during constant isometric contractions.

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.