Literature DB >> 26298044

Processing of visual information compromises the ability of older adults to control novel fine motor tasks.

Harsimran S Baweja1, MinHyuk Kwon2, Tanya Onushko2, David L Wright3, Daniel M Corcos4, Evangelos A Christou5.   

Abstract

We performed two experiments to determine whether amplified motor output variability and compromised processing of visual information in older adults impair short-term adaptations when learning novel fine motor tasks. In Experiment 1, 12 young and 12 older adults underwent training to learn how to accurately trace a sinusoidal position target with abduction-adduction of their index finger. They performed 48 trials, which included 8 blocks of 6 trials (the last trial of each block was performed without visual feedback). Afterward, subjects received an interference task (watched a movie) for 60 min. We tested retention by asking subjects to perform the sinusoidal task (5 trials) with and without visual feedback. In Experiment 2, 12 young and 10 older adults traced the same sinusoidal position target with their index finger and ankle at three distinct visual angles (0.25°, 1° and 5.4°). In Experiment 1, the movement error and variability were greater for older adults during the visual feedback trials when compared with young adults. In contrast, during the no-vision trials, age-associated differences in movement error and variability were ameliorated. Short-term adaptations in learning the sinusoidal task were similar for young and older adults. In Experiment 2, lower amount of visual feedback minimized the age-associated differences in movement variability for both the index finger and ankle movements. We demonstrate that although short-term adaptations are similar for young and older adults, older adults do not process visual information as well as young adults and that compromises their ability to control novel fine motor tasks during acquisition, which could influence long-term retention and transfer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Visual feedback; Visuomotor processing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26298044     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4408-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  50 in total

1.  The influence of age on weight-bearing joint reposition sense of the knee.

Authors:  J E Bullock-Saxton; W J Wong; N Hogan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-related changes in spatial and temporal gait variables.

Authors:  P C Grabiner; S T Biswas; M D Grabiner
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Changes in multi-joint performance with age.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Jay L Alberts; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.422

4.  Age-dependent changes in position sense in human proximal interphalangeal joints.

Authors:  W R Ferrell; A Crighton; R D Sturrock
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Different neural adjustments improve endpoint accuracy with practice in young and old adults.

Authors:  Evangelos A Christou; Brach Poston; Joel A Enoka; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Aging, visuomotor correction, and force fluctuations in large muscles.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Devin V Dinenno; Bjorn Jorgensen; Seth J Welsh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 7.  Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; James P Coxon; Nicole Wenderoth; Annouchka Van Impe; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control.

Authors:  J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  How cortical neurons help us see: visual recognition in the human brain.

Authors:  Julie Blumberg; Gabriel Kreiman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  White matter changes compromise prefrontal cortex function in healthy elderly individuals.

Authors:  Christine Wu Nordahl; Charan Ranganath; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charles Decarli; Evan Fletcher; William J Jagust
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  10 in total

1.  Fatigue-induced adjustment in antagonist coactivation by old adults during a steadiness task.

Authors:  Christopher J Arellano; David Caha; Joseph E Hennessey; Ioannis G Amiridis; Stéphane Baudry; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-02-04

2.  Visual information processing in older adults: reaction time and motor unit pool modulation.

Authors:  MinHyuk Kwon; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Altered visual strategies and attention are related to increased force fluctuations during a pinch grip task in older adults.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Wendy E Huddleston; Bradley E Ernest
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Learning new gait patterns: Age-related differences in skill acquisition and interlimb transfer.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Edward P Washabaugh; Courtney E Reid; Matteo M Althoen; Rajiv Ranganathan
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.032

5.  Memory-guided force control in healthy younger and older adults.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Shaadee Samimy; Samantha L Blouch; Peiyuan Wang; Amanda Chennavasin; Michele T Diaz; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Aging affects postural tracking of complex visual motion cues.

Authors:  H Sotirakis; A Kyvelidou; L Mademli; N Stergiou; V Hatzitaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visuospatial function predicts one-week motor skill retention in cognitively intact older adults.

Authors:  Jennapher Lingo VanGilder; Caitlin R Hengge; Kevin Duff; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Leah N Hitchcock; Seth J Welsh; Roger J Paxton; Caitlin E Feldman-Kothe
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Force Steadiness During a Cognitively Challenging Motor Task Is Predicted by Executive Function in Older Adults.

Authors:  Hugo M Pereira; Bonnie Schlinder-Delap; Kristy A Nielson; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  A Mobile App Directory of Occupational Therapists Who Provide Home Modifications: Development and Preliminary Usability Evaluation.

Authors:  An Thi Nguyen; Emily Kling Somerville; Sandra Martina Espín-Tello; Marian Keglovits; Susan Lynn Stark
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2020-03-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.