Literature DB >> 19680640

Effects of visual gain on force control at the elbow and ankle.

Janey Prodoehl1, David E Vaillancourt.   

Abstract

Visual feedback is essential when minimizing force fluctuations. Varying degrees of somatotopic organization have been shown in different regions of the brain for the upper and lower extremities, and visual feedback may be processed differently based on the body effector where feedback-based corrections are used. This study compared the effect of changes in visual gain on the control of steady-state force at the elbow and ankle. Ten subjects produced steady-state isometric force to targets at 5 and 40% of their maximum voluntary contraction at seven visual gain levels. Visual gain was used effectively at both joints to reduce variability of the force signal and to improve accuracy, with a greater effect of visual gain at the elbow than the ankle. Visual gain significantly decreased the regularity of force output, and this effect was more pronounced at the elbow than the ankle. There were accompanying changes in the proportion of power in the 0-4, 4-8, and 8-12 Hz frequency bins of the force signal across visual gain at the elbow. Changes in visual gain were accompanied by changes in both agonist and antagonist electromyographic (EMG) activation at the elbow. At the ankle joint, there were only changes in agonist EMG. The results suggest better use of visual information in the control of elbow force than ankle force and this improved control may be related to the changes in the pattern of agonist and antagonist activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19680640      PMCID: PMC2842579          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1966-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  58 in total

1.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity.

Authors:  S M Pincus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Daniel M Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints.

Authors:  Andreas R Luft; Gerald V Smith; Larry Forrester; Jill Whitall; Richard F Macko; Till-Karsten Hauser; Andrew P Goldberg; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Functional somatotopy in sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Martha Flanders
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Somatotopically arranged inputs from putamen and subthalamic nucleus to primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Shigehiro Miyachi; Xiaofeng Lu; Michiko Imanishi; Kaori Sawada; Atsushi Nambu; Masahiko Takada
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 3.304

6.  Cortical networks for visual reaching: physiological and anatomical organization of frontal and parietal lobe arm regions.

Authors:  P B Johnson; S Ferraina; L Bianchi; R Caminiti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Motor-unit activity responsible for 8- to 12-Hz component of human physiological finger tremor.

Authors:  R J Elble; J E Randall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  The role of basal ganglia in rhythmic movement.

Authors:  H J Freund; H Hefter
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1993

9.  Physiological time-series analysis: what does regularity quantify?

Authors:  S M Pincus; A L Goldberger
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-04

10.  Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study.

Authors:  I Miyai; H C Tanabe; I Sase; H Eda; I Oda; I Konishi; Y Tsunazawa; T Suzuki; T Yanagida; K Kubota
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  22 in total

1.  Time gain influences adaptive visual-motor isometric force control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Molly M Mazich; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-related differences in force variability and visual display.

Authors:  Edward Ofori; Jean M Samson; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual information gain and task asymmetry interact in bimanual force coordination and control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of visual feedback absence on force control during isometric contraction.

Authors:  Eloisa Limonta; Susanna Rampichini; Emiliano Cè; Fabio Esposito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Transient shifts in frontal and parietal circuits scale with enhanced visual feedback and changes in force variability and error.

Authors:  Cynthia Poon; Stephen A Coombes; Daniel M Corcos; Evangelos A Christou; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Force and time gain interact to nonlinearly scale adaptive visual-motor isometric force control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Aging and limb alter the neuromuscular control of goal-directed movements.

Authors:  MinHyuk Kwon; Yen-Ting Chen; Emily J Fox; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Removing visual feedback for a single limb alters between-limb force tremor relationships during isometric bilateral contractions.

Authors:  Leanne C Kenway; Leanne M Bisset; Justin J Kavanagh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Variability, frequency composition, and temporal regularity of submaximal isometric elbow flexion force in subacute stroke.

Authors:  John W Chow; Dobrivoje S Stokic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Greater amount of visual feedback decreases force variability by reducing force oscillations from 0-1 and 3-7 Hz.

Authors:  Harsimran S Baweja; Deanna M Kennedy; Julie Vu; David E Vaillancourt; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.