Literature DB >> 21800256

Greater amount of visual information exacerbates force control in older adults during constant isometric contractions.

Deanna M Kennedy1, Evangelos A Christou.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare control of force and modulation of agonist muscle activity of young and older adults when the amount of visual feedback was varied at two different force levels. Ten young adults (25 years ± 4 years, 5 men and 5 women) and ten older adults (71 years ± 5 years, 4 men and 6 women) were instructed to accurately match a constant target force at 2 and 30% of their maximal isometric force with abduction of the index finger. Each trial lasted 35 s, and the amount of visual feedback was varied by changing the visual angle at 0.05, 0.5, and 1.5°. Each subject performed three trials for each visual angle condition. Force variability was quantified as the standard deviation and coefficient of variation (CV) of force. Modulation of the agonist muscle activity was quantified as the normalized power spectrum density of the EMG signal recorded from two pairs of bipolar electrodes placed on the first dorsal interosseus muscle. The frequency bands of interest were between 5 and 100 Hz. There were significant age-associated differences in force control with changes in the amount of visual feedback. The CV of force did not change with visual angle for young adults, whereas it increased for older adults. Although older adults exhibited similar CV of force to young adults at 0.05° (5.95 ± 0.67 vs. 5.47 ± 0.5), older adults exhibited greater CV of force than young adults at 0.5° (8.49 ± 1.34 vs. 5.05 ± 0.5) and 1.5° (8.23 ± 1.12 vs. 5.49 ± 0.6). In addition, there were age-associated differences in the modulation of the agonist muscle activity. Young adults increased normalized power in the EMG signal from 13 to 60 Hz with an increase in visual angle, whereas older adults did not. These findings suggest that greater amount of visual information may be detrimental to the control of a constant isometric contraction in older adults, and this impairment may be due to their inability to effectively modulate the motor neuron pool of the agonist muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21800256      PMCID: PMC3631570          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2777-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Rectification and non-linear pre-processing of EMG signals for cortico-muscular analysis.

Authors:  L J Myers; M Lowery; M O'Malley; C L Vaughan; C Heneghan; A St Clair Gibson; Y X R Harley; R Sreenivasan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Daniel M Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multi-directional strength and force envelope of the index finger.

Authors:  Zong-Ming Li; H Jamie Pfaeffle; Dean G Sotereanos; Robert J Goitz; Savio L-Y Woo
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Aging, visual intermittency, and variability in isometric force output.

Authors:  Jacob J Sosnoff; Karl M Newell
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Aging, visuomotor correction, and force fluctuations in large muscles.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Devin V Dinenno; Bjorn Jorgensen; Seth J Welsh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 6.  Visual function and fitness to drive.

Authors:  Aachal Kotecha; Alexander Spratt; Ananth Viswanathan
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.291

7.  Selective regions of the visuomotor system are related to gain-induced changes in force error.

Authors:  Stephen A Coombes; Daniel M Corcos; Lisa Sprute; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Old adults exhibit greater motor output variability than young adults only during rapid discrete isometric contractions.

Authors:  E A Christou; L G Carlton
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Aging and the Simon task.

Authors:  Rob H J van der Lubbe; Rolf Verleger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Effects of visual gain on force control at the elbow and ankle.

Authors:  Janey Prodoehl; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  26 in total

1.  Processing of visual information compromises the ability of older adults to control novel fine motor tasks.

Authors:  Harsimran S Baweja; MinHyuk Kwon; Tanya Onushko; David L Wright; Daniel M Corcos; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of visual feedback absence on force control during isometric contraction.

Authors:  Eloisa Limonta; Susanna Rampichini; Emiliano Cè; Fabio Esposito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Visual information processing in older adults: reaction time and motor unit pool modulation.

Authors:  MinHyuk Kwon; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Age-related differences in finger force control are characterized by reduced force production.

Authors:  Solveig Vieluf; Ben Godde; Eva-Maria Reuter; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Transient shifts in frontal and parietal circuits scale with enhanced visual feedback and changes in force variability and error.

Authors:  Cynthia Poon; Stephen A Coombes; Daniel M Corcos; Evangelos A Christou; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Force and time gain interact to nonlinearly scale adaptive visual-motor isometric force control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effect of age on human-computer-interface control via neck electromyography.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Hands; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Interact Comput       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 1.174

8.  Altered activation of the antagonist muscle during practice compromises motor learning in older adults.

Authors:  Yen-Ting Chen; MinHyuk Kwon; Emily J Fox; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Age-related differences in the availability of visual feedback during bimanual pinch.

Authors:  Kazumi Critchley; Masahiro Kokubu; Motoyuki Iemitsu; Satoshi Fujita; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Memory-guided force control in healthy younger and older adults.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Shaadee Samimy; Samantha L Blouch; Peiyuan Wang; Amanda Chennavasin; Michele T Diaz; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.