Literature DB >> 14580834

Multi-directional strength and force envelope of the index finger.

Zong-Ming Li1, H Jamie Pfaeffle, Dean G Sotereanos, Robert J Goitz, Savio L-Y Woo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to biomechanically evaluate the motor function of the index finger based on multi-directional strengths.
DESIGN: An experimental apparatus was developed to measure force production of a digit at various points of force application along the digit and in any direction of force application within the transverse plane of the longitudinal axis of the digit.
BACKGROUND: Most existing tests of hand motor function are subjective, semiquantitative, and/or non-specific.
METHODS: Eight normal subjects with asymptomatic hands were tested. Maximum voluntary isometric contraction forces were measured at the middle of the proximal phalanx of the index finger in 16 directions that were evenly distributed within 360 degrees.
RESULTS: The highest force, 110.7 (SD 9.0) N, was generated in flexion, while the lowest force was generated in extension. The forces in extension, abduction and adduction were 37.6%, 97.9% and 79.3% of the flexion force, respectively. The area of the force envelope was 25739 (SD 3688) N-N. The average percentage quadrant areas, relative to the total force envelope area, for extension-adduction, extension-abduction, flexion-abduction, and flexion-adduction were 12.9%, 20.4%, 36.0%, and 30.8%, respectively. The average percentage quadrant areas for extension, abduction, flexion, and adduction were 9.1%, 33.3%, 35.6%, and 22.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The current study provides an advanced level of quantification of hand motor function. RELEVANCE: The methods may be used as a basis to detect changes in the motor function resulting from pathological conditions, disease progression, as well as rehabilitation and treatment of these disorders.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14580834     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00178-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  20 in total

1.  Long-term adaptations differ for shortening and lengthening contractions.

Authors:  Osmar Pinto Neto; Hillary Lindheim; Ana Carolina de Miranda Marzullo; Harsimran S Baweja; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Finger interaction in a three-dimensional pressing task.

Authors:  Shweta Kapur; Jason Friedman; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Control of finger force direction in the flexion-extension plane.

Authors:  Fan Gao; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Discharge rate during low-force isometric contractions influences motor unit coherence below 15 Hz but not motor unit synchronization.

Authors:  Evangelos A Christou; Thorsten Rudroff; Joel A Enoka; François Meyer; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Endpoint accuracy for a small and a large hand muscle in young and old adults during rapid, goal-directed isometric contractions.

Authors:  Brach Poston; Joel A Enoka; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multifinger ab- and adduction strength and coordination.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.950

7.  Rectification of the EMG signal impairs the identification of oscillatory input to the muscle.

Authors:  Osmar Pinto Neto; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Computing motor unit number index of the first dorsal interosseous muscle with two different contraction tasks.

Authors:  Ping Zhou; Xiaoyan Li; William Zev Rymer
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  Muscle activation and time to task failure differ with load type and contraction intensity for a human hand muscle.

Authors:  Katrina S Maluf; Minoru Shinohara; Jennifer L Stephenson; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Greater amount of visual feedback decreases force variability by reducing force oscillations from 0-1 and 3-7 Hz.

Authors:  Harsimran S Baweja; Deanna M Kennedy; Julie Vu; David E Vaillancourt; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.